From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82])
	by walapai.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id q2706csB032412
	for <caml-list@sympa-roc.inria.fr>; Wed, 7 Mar 2012 01:06:38 +0100
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvoBAFOmVk9CbwQdkGdsb2JhbABDgwmxeCIBAQEBCQkNBxQEI4JEOAI7FhgDAgECAUsNCAEBiAOmQZMTBpBwiFaSUI03
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.73,542,1325458800"; 
   d="scan'208";a="147923083"
Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29])
  by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 07 Mar 2012 01:06:33 +0100
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.44])
	by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EC2B21047
	for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Tue,  6 Mar 2012 19:06:32 -0500 (EST)
Received: from frontend2.nyi.mail.srv.osa ([10.202.2.161])
  by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 06 Mar 2012 19:06:32 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
	messagingengine.com; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to
	:subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=smtpout; bh=E
	RrhKMqfnmX6ANw7g/w2PIpLiWo=; b=Xq8NCOEZplwHvT7trUvRY4VAoJjIWYItU
	P/XVCnucCeQ8LsoIsSGuK4ZFGmw7Yi5wz18ZHrgVOC0MbIbSwYiX8p+8shjjaewX
	DFMLOwJdh/G9hGpC5Avjjb0hVqX/Vpt2VrbcawetllrpsMezsdCbBpOIotAeJFaC
	9P9KLrMU/Y=
X-Sasl-enc: m2izKq4VPcoXbLMgpswjPGi3yh+/Zka2C6JeMJJ5uP3a 1331078791
Received: from [192.168.1.206] (64-71-1-165.static.wiline.com [64.71.1.165])
	by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BD6874824A3
	for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Tue,  6 Mar 2012 19:06:31 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <4F56A686.5090108@ens-lyon.org>
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 16:06:30 -0800
From: Martin Jambon <martin.jambon@ens-lyon.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20101023 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: OCaml Mailing List <caml-list@inria.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Caml-list] ocamlopt -g

Dear all,

Is there is any disadvantage of using -g with ocamlopt?

A number of libraries are not compiled with -g and this prevents us from
getting a complete stack backtrace when they raise an exception. Are
there technical reasons for that, other than "this is an old library and
we haven't touched the Makefile since ocamlopt offers -g"?


Martin