From: Jacques Carette <carette@mcmaster.ca>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: [Caml-list] inlining/eta-expansion question
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 13:53:23 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F468B23.6020006@mcmaster.ca> (raw)
What difference is there, if any, between
let plus = (+)
and
let plus = fun a b -> a + b
?
I know that, operationally, these are identical. What I am wondering
is, do applications of 'plus' always compile down to the exact same thing?
In code that I am writing, due to interactions with the value
restriction, I have to eta-expand all my definitions. So I am wondering
what cost I will have to pay for the 'genericity' of my code.
Jacques
next reply other threads:[~2012-02-23 18:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-23 18:53 Jacques Carette [this message]
2012-02-24 1:15 ` Jacques Garrigue
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F468B23.6020006@mcmaster.ca \
--to=carette@mcmaster.ca \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox