From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by walapai.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id pBHIaUNV007749 for ; Sat, 17 Dec 2011 19:36:30 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjsDAFLg7E6K54gDgWdsb2JhbABDhQyjf4JMIgEBFiYlgXIBAQUjVQEQCxoCBQMJCgsCAgkDAgECAUUGDQEHAhCHaKVWkRqBL4cvghCBFgSUfoVOjGE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,369,1320620400"; d="scan'208";a="135864994" Received: from rouge.crans.org ([138.231.136.3]) by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 17 Dec 2011 19:36:29 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost.crans.org [127.0.0.1]) by rouge.crans.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99ECA80E4; Sat, 17 Dec 2011 19:36:28 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at crans.org Received: from rouge.crans.org ([10.231.136.3]) by localhost (rouge.crans.org [10.231.136.3]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id qPEmtz8Bd+qS; Sat, 17 Dec 2011 19:36:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.39.1] (fbx.up7.fr [81.56.96.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by rouge.crans.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5E3578085; Sat, 17 Dec 2011 19:36:28 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4EECE12B.3050100@glondu.net> Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2011 19:36:27 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?U3TDqXBoYW5lIEdsb25kdQ==?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111114 Icedove/3.1.16 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Xavier Leroy CC: caml-list@inria.fr References: <55531934-37A5-4CC5-AB67-20CE4CCE8269@googlemail.com> <4EE37070.4010702@inria.fr> In-Reply-To: <4EE37070.4010702@inria.fr> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 OpenPGP: id=49881AD3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by walapai.inria.fr id pBHIaUNV007749 Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OCaml maintenance status / community fork (again) Le 10/12/2011 15:45, Xavier Leroy a écrit : > 4- Yes, we obviously have problems with PR triaging, in part because Mantis > makes this task more bureaucratic than strictly necessary, but more > importantly because it is often hard to guess who cares about this or that > suggestion, or even what problem it is supposed to address. Volunteers > could greatly help by simply commenting on the PRs in Mantis, to express > support or disagreement, or to ask for clarifications. By the way, is there a way to "subscribe" to all ocaml bugs? In my account preferences, all "E-mail on ..." are checked, but I don't receive mails for all activities on the bugtracker (I only receive mails for bug I'm monitoring). Cheers, -- Stéphane