From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82])
	by walapai.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id pB977PQM030434
	for <caml-list@sympa-roc.inria.fr>; Fri, 9 Dec 2011 08:07:25 +0100
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AiUBAHqy4U5CbwQakGdsb2JhbABDqnEiAQEBAQkJDQcUBCGBcgEBBAFAOAIECwshFg8JAwIBAgFFEwgBARCHc6UQkgYHiCODGogxkgiMfQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,325,1320620400"; 
   d="scan'208";a="134663629"
Received: from out2.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26])
  by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 09 Dec 2011 08:07:20 +0100
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.43])
	by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31AE021A2C
	for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Fri,  9 Dec 2011 02:07:19 -0500 (EST)
Received: from frontend2.nyi.mail.srv.osa ([10.202.2.161])
  by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 09 Dec 2011 02:07:19 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
	messagingengine.com; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to
	:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=smtpout; bh=ow+WSwk+XkPRoLFGcWzIUU
	6ZZsE=; b=iHSsK887a9a+eNeYDeYATuc2qq9Lo+X5/+XKbmabLn4MtcEKrLNit4
	U+VTYXh5oUiAf6wRD0hDz5f6lhUx2QFPDILuO4NcNf0GwTZay7C9MyAl9s+iFz8D
	Aj3XpnDxfh+ns3XbRDa5MBvi84QKpefF7Ng8n3jy756x3ROgtWJoc=
X-Sasl-enc: haFuofhqfUsUNChQmG7NjKXlCTzP80bGa6hUiAPawVjN 1323414438
Received: from [192.168.2.3] (c-98-248-39-171.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [98.248.39.171])
	by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D6D7C482592
	for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Fri,  9 Dec 2011 02:07:18 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <4EE1B524.3000506@ens-lyon.org>
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2011 23:13:40 -0800
From: Martin Jambon <martin.jambon@ens-lyon.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20101023 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: caml-list@inria.fr
References: <4EDE33A0.6070004@gmail.com> <4EDE568C.9040803@lexifi.com>
In-Reply-To: <4EDE568C.9040803@lexifi.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Some comments on recent discussions

On 12/06/2011 09:53 AM, Alain Frisch wrote:

> That said, I'd argue to avoid creating a "community" fork.

I would like to point out that in the GitHub jargon, a "fork" is just a
personal branch, usually intended to be merged back into the main
repository via a so-called "pull request".

I hope there won't be any misunderstanding because of that.


Martin