From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105]) by walapai.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id p7TC3tiP003689 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 14:03:55 +0200 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArcBAGt/W05KfVK2kGdsb2JhbABCp3YIFAEBAQEJCQ0HFAQhgUABAQEBAxICLAEbHAEBAwwGBQsNCRYPCQMCAQIBEREBBQEcBg0BBwEBHqMACow7glWEPTuIbQIDBoZGBI4VhQqFDoEohis8g2g X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.68,296,1312149600"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="106945722" Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com ([74.125.82.182]) by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 29 Aug 2011 14:03:49 +0200 Received: by wyh15 with SMTP id 15so6835485wyh.27 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 05:03:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type; bh=8Wxs9EM4tWoJ4anLeLs81folChY1D7Fo8I7OC7doXrY=; b=nodwVxsSLwe1ums4qnaKFXWPJt9y6uYt5H4vQUxGzXzpsIW7kWup4OHynR3AWpBZkw GDqjSqLinpO+hq0efck7q5lxNAXzwy09f+Dgd+hKD8V1epwNonau4hjU9SAbqiCaGv60 opPVtTrp58f7gffLEPYjkjSkToMBA5tDS+J2s= Received: by 10.227.175.79 with SMTP id w15mr3709744wbz.56.1314619429340; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 05:03:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [129.215.90.43] (dhcp-90-043.inf.ed.ac.uk [129.215.90.43]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fm9sm3683778wbb.10.2011.08.29.05.03.16 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 29 Aug 2011 05:03:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E5B8006.9070200@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 13:03:18 +0100 From: Chris Yocum User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110805 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Guillaume Yziquel CC: Jacques Garrigue , Gerd Stolpmann , Jeff Meister , david.baelde@ens-lyon.org, caml-list References: <4E58CCC3.4040901@gmail.com> <1314457588.3496.86.camel@thinkpad> <1314473840.3496.132.camel@thinkpad> <1314486489.3496.179.camel@thinkpad> <61B410B8-15EF-4B18-9CC5-C224FB495353@math.nagoya-u.ac.jp> <4E5B75DE.2020609@gmail.com> <20110829114755.GD4564@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20110829114755.GD4564@localhost> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigCB8948D2B8F412162307A5B0" Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Ocaml and the Fragile Base Class Problem This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigCB8948D2B8F412162307A5B0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable There are some parts in there that go back to Ocaml 1.00. I doubt that they will change anytime soon. Anyway, linking is a good idea. Chris On 29/08/11 12:47, Guillaume Yziquel wrote: > Le Monday 29 Aug 2011 =E0 12:19:58 (+0100), Chris Yocum a =E9crit : >> >> I was wondering if we should fold "Language Extensions" into the main >> documentation? >=20 > To my understanding, "Language Extensions" refers to part of the > language that may evolve in future versions, as opposed to the core > language which is supposed to be more stable. So this distinction does > make sense. Now a few pointers in the main documentation to sections in > "Language Extensions" aren't a bad idea either. >=20 --------------enigCB8948D2B8F412162307A5B0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iF4EAREIAAYFAk5bgAYACgkQDjE+CSbP7HrqhgD+KyzMhZWoNfUnaa90Y2MuUVIp 8vZjRIPcVD8fGlRCTNMBAKqYl2Ki8SWdST7yaXEg1Cyvf0n4jeIfVHlBEG6PCzky =pNJP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigCB8948D2B8F412162307A5B0--