From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83])
	by walapai.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id p2PAKVe4006855
	for <caml-list@sympa-roc.inria.fr>; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 11:20:31 +0100
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AnYEAPFrjE3RVaE0kGdsb2JhbACYVIx2CBQBAQIJCQ0HFAQhqF6KVAqCF4UqL4hcAQEDBYVkBIx1g1ROJYI3ggs6KA
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.63,242,1299452400"; 
   d="scan'208";a="94847368"
Received: from mail-fx0-f52.google.com ([209.85.161.52])
  by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 25 Mar 2011 11:20:26 +0100
Received: by fxm6 with SMTP id 6so1315687fxm.39
        for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 03:20:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent
         :mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=4BD6FNXE0FJ7IHuuY6OUoUcL80wY2VHJlpRFTTwyqHo=;
        b=qLge9xbSvGVOwgXMJyYS0SUaWg2hKeHbHU8k49w8oU36jQF0JI/8hZeIPlmFJfg7sU
         92Z9TkepEjAlYEEUmV+QuEAR1RuFrEsLeqJlXDhdWOlOdVdkgaztfmbbQC0Xqi13KnLv
         KtNdx5ZVs0Uhu3YgtFTgT0LXcsm5HSfeOcIQ8=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject
         :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=T9VUO95TZziFb2DkmsR8f9f0NHmhoiNMzK9RwxVQcDAAK6NfPaaxpdrs5tU3HDhrYl
         q/jbAvYWfFLHRSPUyVMv2hMS0Qi3BqCeBdl8bg1+rnJTwMDBsXq9vOvb4D4RvGBuFPi2
         8RWBIaYJvIg6jQ5MLd9TrOKRIuYzlM4rP9UOc=
Received: by 10.223.24.72 with SMTP id u8mr680165fab.10.1301048416181;
        Fri, 25 Mar 2011 03:20:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.17.1.5] (papillon.metalscan.fr [93.95.58.150])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l4sm335697fan.14.2011.03.25.03.20.14
        (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Fri, 25 Mar 2011 03:20:14 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4D8C6C5D.8000502@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 11:20:13 +0100
From: Matthieu Dubuget <matthieu.dubuget@gmail.com>
Reply-To: matthieu.dubuget@gmail.com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110223 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: florent.ouchet@imag.fr
CC: Caml Mailing List <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>
References: <4D8C5071.2000403@gmail.com> <4D8C684D.3040702@imag.fr>
In-Reply-To: <4D8C684D.3040702@imag.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Java JVM is becoming more strict

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Java JVM is becoming more strict
From: Florent Ouchet <florent.ouchet@imag.fr>
To: matthieu.dubuget@gmail.com
Date: 25/03/2011 11:02
> Hello Matthieu,
>
> Is your application a console application or a GUI application? In the 
> second case, I've already seen cases where STDIN/STDOUT/STDERR pipes 
> are completly invalid while it does work in other cases.


That's it. This is a GUI ultrasonic data acquisition system. The DLL is 
used to process som datas.