From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <matthieu.dubuget@gmail.com>
Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105])
	by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB4DDBC37
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:19:29 +0100 (CET)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: At8BAH72X0vRVdzeimdsb2JhbACTUodFPQEBAQoJDAcRBa1xCoE4hS+ILwEBAwWENASLDg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,355,1262559600"; 
   d="scan'208";a="54793905"
Received: from mail-fx0-f222.google.com ([209.85.220.222])
  by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 27 Jan 2010 17:19:29 +0100
Received: by fxm22 with SMTP id 22so6158776fxm.22
        for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 08:19:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to
         :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=0bSpQToU4j9gifbsRu7PF8r7HLXbhuF+9jdXd6bJrGc=;
        b=ixyUpeh3GfFWUC5NDuPKzVg1qYZKeNz+pWvFj1pqLACou3d9yRnkwfn/2den9AalFz
         zU8hJzscuHn0w6aGpWY0e1a6ErcsLXuG0oYeUcmjsl28SZNqe6/foOJpEPU3SGlJv9A+
         fpeHc7TYfNzaCDLJOSftsFZoRZgYIQKUNejhI=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject
         :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=ZITpv+XTJrsxj4NTof1ZGAg0aMv8UqeBhcxwwG9d1lq+8LTGRe6OGunOEIHlOTJTAX
         CRsE4SP0DrMyA7TMMDtU1a1cF3VAupuKv/E7WZBl5MWijIHlYZ8mpZVhWYyFpOt/0drC
         mNPaOypuFazmUavSDa6ETQFe7I1SmDIzHHYEU=
Received: by 10.87.61.4 with SMTP id o4mr5944198fgk.31.1264609169039;
        Wed, 27 Jan 2010 08:19:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?172.17.0.15? (papillon.metalscan.fr [212.73.210.234])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 12sm16907663fgg.7.2010.01.27.08.19.27
        (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
        Wed, 27 Jan 2010 08:19:28 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4B60678F.6040202@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:19:27 +0100
From: Matthieu Dubuget <matthieu.dubuget@gmail.com>
Reply-To: matthieu.dubuget@gmail.com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8pre) Gecko/20100124 Shredder/3.0.2pre
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Cc: Rabih EL-CHAAR <rabih.el-chaar@lyxor.com>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] dynamic link library path under mingw [NC]
References: <OFADF969C5.D91DC9AB-ONC12576B8.00501EF9-C12576B8.00504814@fr.world.socgen>
In-Reply-To: <OFADF969C5.D91DC9AB-ONC12576B8.00501EF9-C12576B8.00504814@fr.world.socgen>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam: no; 0.00; matthieu:01 dubuget:01 matthieu:01 dubuget:01 mingw:01 mingw:01 -dllpath:01 ocamlmklib:01 -verbose:01 -dllpath:01 caml-list:01 caml-list:01 native:03 suggestion:03 library:03 

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] dynamic link library path under mingw [NC]
From: Rabih EL-CHAAR <rabih.el-chaar@lyxor.com>
To: matthieu.dubuget@gmail.com
Date: 27/01/2010 15:36

>
> Why you're not using -dllpath option in ocamlmklib?
> I think this should solve your problem (didn't make the check).

I did. With no more success.

I even did it with -verbose, with and without -dllpath: the emitted 
commands are the same

Thanks for your suggestion

P.S. I have the same kind of problem with native code. Is there any way 
to store search path for dynamic libraries in PO/COFF programs?

Salutations

Matt