From: Matthias Puech <puech@cs.unibo.it>
To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Sets and home-made ordered types
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 23:38:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AB15AD4.4030809@cs.unibo.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <002e01ca36fd$37656c60$a6304520$@metastack.com>
David Allsopp a écrit :
> Is it not possible to model your requirement using Map.Make instead - where
> the keys represent the equivalence classes and the values whatever data
> you're associating with them?
Yes, that's exactly the workaround I ended up using, although I'm not
very happy with it because, among other things, these keys/class
disciminant get duplicated (once inside the key, once inside the
element). I'm getting more concrete below.
> In terms of a strictly pure implementation of a functional Set, it would be
> odd to have a "find" function - you'll also get some interesting undefined
> behaviour with these sets if you try to operations like union and
> intersection but I guess you're already happy with that!
It seems to me rather natural to have it: otherwise, what's the point of
being able to provide your own compare, beside just checking for
membership of the class? The implementation of the function is
straightforward: just copy mem and make it return the element in case
of success:
let rec find x = function
Empty -> raise Not_found
| Node(l, v, r, _) ->
let c = Ord.compare x v in
if c = 0 then v else
find x (if c < 0 then l else r)
For union and inter, I don't see how their behavior would be undefined,
since neither the datastructure nor the functions are changed.
Here is what I want to do: Given a purely first-order datastructure,
let's say:
type t = F of t | G of t * t | A | B
I want to index values of type t according to their first constructor.
So in my set structure, there will be at most one term starting with
each constructor, and:
find (F(A)) (add (F(B)) empty) will return F(B)
With a Set.find, it's easy:
let compare x y = match x,y with
| (F,F | G,G | A,A | B,B) -> 0
| _ -> Pervasives.compare x y
module S = Set.Make ...
With the Map solution, i'm obliged to define:
type cstr = F' | G' | A' | B'
let cstr_of x = F _ -> F' | G _ -> G' etc.
and then make a Map : cstr |--> t, which duplicates the occurrence of
the constructor (F' in the key, F in the element). Besides, I'm
responsible for making sure that the pair e.g. (G', F(A)) is not added.
Thanks for your answer anyway!
-- Matthias
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-16 21:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-16 16:40 Matthias Puech
[not found] ` <002e01ca36fd$37656c60$a6304520$@metastack.com>
2009-09-16 21:38 ` Matthias Puech [this message]
2009-09-17 3:05 ` [Caml-list] " Damien Guichard
2009-09-17 7:31 ` [Caml-list] " Vincent Aravantinos
2009-09-17 8:39 ` David Allsopp
2009-09-23 10:46 ` Goswin von Brederlow
[not found] <20090917030607.927BCBCA9@yquem.inria.fr>
2009-09-17 6:21 ` Caml-list] " CUOQ Pascal
2009-09-17 8:45 ` [Caml-list] " Matthias Puech
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AB15AD4.4030809@cs.unibo.it \
--to=puech@cs.unibo.it \
--cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox