From: Christophe Raffalli <raffalli@univ-savoie.fr>
To: OCaml <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: evaluation order
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 18:36:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A352717.7020909@univ-savoie.fr> (raw)
Hello,
In OCaml-3.11.1 (I did not try other version),
the following code print 0 when compiled in bytecode and 1 in nativecode
for obvious reason of different evaluation order in the pair ...
let ptr = ref 0
let fn b =
if b then incr ptr else decr ptr
let c = fn true, !ptr
let _ = print_int (snd c); print_newline ()
Is any difference between ocamlc and ocamlopt a bug ?
Cheers,
Christophe
next reply other threads:[~2009-06-14 16:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-14 16:36 Christophe Raffalli [this message]
2009-06-14 17:45 ` Rémi Vanicat
2009-06-14 19:40 ` [Caml-list] " Jon Harrop
2009-06-14 21:12 ` Christophe Raffalli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A352717.7020909@univ-savoie.fr \
--to=raffalli@univ-savoie.fr \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox