From: DooMeeR <d@doomeer.com>
To: Jon Harrop <jon@ffconsultancy.com>
Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Re: ocamlbuild documentation (was Re: [Caml-list] Re: [ANN] OCaml Batteries Included, alpha 3)
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 22:24:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49909F14.6010601@doomeer.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200902091828.30057.jon@ffconsultancy.com>
I'll skip over the documentation questions because people are beginning
to say that I troll too much :p
> Instead, I found that ocamlbuild replaces my current build option of choice:
>
> ocamlopt foo.ml -I +lablGL lablgl.cmxa lablglut.cmxa foo.ml -o foo
>
> with lots of incidental complexity:
>
> $ cat myocamlbuild.ml
> open Ocamlbuild_plugin;;
> open Command;;
>
> dispatch begin function
> | After_rules ->
> ocaml_lib ~extern:true ~dir:"+lablGL" "lablgl";
> ocaml_lib ~extern:true ~dir:"+lablGL" "lablglut";
> | _ -> ()
> end;;
>
> $ cat _tags
> <main.{byte,native}>: use_lablgl, use_lablglut
> <**/*.ml>: use_lablgl
>
> $ ocamlbuild foo.native
This is, indeed, and in my opinion, one of the BIGGEST problem with
Ocamlbuild right now. In fact you didn't chose the easiest solution,
which is:
ocamlbuild -cflags -I,+lablGL -lflags -I,+lablGL -lib lablgl -lib
lablglut foo.native
However, this is of course very hackish, not documented (took me a while
to figure that this was the simplest way of using a library), and still
not satisfying at all. The extension of Ocamlbuild I am working on
should allow you to replace this by:
ocamlbuild -pkg lablGL.glut foo.native
(the package lablGL.glut depends on the package lablGL, which will thus
be included automatically)
I will work on an extension to allow tags such as use_pkg(lablGL.glut)
to put this in a _tag file if you get tired of using the command line
option.
This will require findlib though. If you do not have findlib, another
solution I may implement someday would be:
ocamlbuild -libs +lablGL/lablgl,+lablGL/lablglut foo.native
Which is still better than the solution using ocamlopt directly IMO
(because here, ocamlbuild can at least guess whether it should include
the .cmxa or the .cma).
Now, I don't think it will happen someday that Ocamlbuild will be able
to guess that lablGL should be included. It raises too many questions :(
--
Romain Bardou
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-09 21:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-06 16:11 [ANN] OCaml Batteries Included, alpha 3 David Rajchenbach-Teller
2009-02-07 14:21 ` [Caml-list] " Mikkel Fahnøe Jørgensen
2009-02-07 14:43 ` Sylvain Le Gall
2009-02-07 14:58 ` [Caml-list] " Jon Harrop
2009-02-07 15:13 ` Sylvain Le Gall
2009-02-07 16:13 ` [Caml-list] " Matthieu Dubuget
2009-02-07 19:30 ` David Rajchenbach-Teller
2009-02-07 21:13 ` Matthieu Dubuget
2009-02-09 9:36 ` Romain Bardou
2009-02-09 15:56 ` David Teller
2009-02-07 15:46 ` Paolo Donadeo
2009-02-09 9:32 ` Romain Bardou
2009-02-09 10:30 ` ocamlbuild documentation (was Re: [Caml-list] Re: [ANN] OCaml Batteries Included, alpha 3) Daniel Bünzli
2009-02-09 11:51 ` Romain Bardou
2009-02-09 12:30 ` Daniel Bünzli
2009-02-09 12:52 ` Romain Bardou
2009-02-09 13:07 ` Daniel Bünzli
2009-02-09 13:22 ` Romain Bardou
2009-02-09 13:36 ` Daniel Bünzli
2009-02-09 13:59 ` Romain Bardou
2009-02-09 14:04 ` Romain Bardou
2009-02-09 14:37 ` Daniel Bünzli
2009-02-09 17:26 ` Kuba Ober
2009-02-09 18:28 ` Jon Harrop
2009-02-09 21:24 ` DooMeeR [this message]
2009-02-10 14:06 ` ocamlbuild documentation Jan Kybic
2009-02-10 14:27 ` [Caml-list] " Matthieu Dubuget
[not found] ` <87k57ywc0k.fsf@fel.cvut.cz>
2009-02-10 15:50 ` Matthieu Dubuget
2009-02-10 15:58 ` Daniel Bünzli
2009-02-09 18:38 ` ocamlbuild documentation (was Re: [Caml-list] Re: [ANN] OCaml Batteries Included, alpha 3) David Teller
2009-02-09 22:02 ` [Caml-list] Re: [ANN] OCaml Batteries Included, alpha 3 Peter Hawkins
2009-02-09 22:45 ` Mikkel Fahnøe Jørgensen
2009-02-09 22:55 ` Mikkel Fahnøe Jørgensen
2009-02-10 7:48 ` Stefano Zacchiroli
2009-02-10 13:22 ` Mikkel Fahnøe Jørgensen
2009-02-07 20:04 ` Daniel Bünzli
2009-02-08 17:22 ` [Caml-list] " Richard Jones
2009-02-09 8:57 ` David Allsopp
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49909F14.6010601@doomeer.com \
--to=d@doomeer.com \
--cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
--cc=jon@ffconsultancy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox