From: "Michaël Grünewald" <michaelgrunewald@yahoo.fr>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Defining a family of functors
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 16:08:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <497DD1F5.7050702@yahoo.fr> (raw)
I am facing a situation that could be solved by ``defining a family of
functors'', I describe the problem and would be very glad to get your
views about it.
To illustrate the situation, I will suppose A1, ..., An are modules
implementing the same signature S, let's say S contains the usual
opertations on groups (mathematical groups, you can replace this by
vector spaces, or whatever). It is easy to write a Product2 functor
Product2: A1:S -> A2:S -> S2
producing an implementation for the direct product (with signature S) of
the groups A1 and A2, plus injections j1 : A1.t -> S2.t and j2: A2.t ->
S2.t and corresponding projections (the type t denotes the module
thingie, as usual). This extension of S is here written S2.
My problem is ``how do I remove the 2'' ? Would it be possible to define
a functor scheme [:)]
Productn: A1:S -> .. -> An:S -> Sn
able to instantiate concrete functors for any value of n ?
It is possible to generate automatically appropriate code for small
values of n, but I am looking for a better approach. It is simple to get
close of the solution in the object paradigm, since I can simply put
objects in an array and iterate over this array (IIRC this is the
aggregate design pattern), but I do not see an easy way to define
injections and projections.
--
Thanks for your suggestions,
Michaël
next reply other threads:[~2009-01-26 15:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-26 15:08 Michaël Grünewald [this message]
2009-01-26 15:15 ` [Caml-list] " Jacques Carette
2009-01-27 14:30 ` Andrej Bauer
2009-01-27 14:47 ` Jacques Carette
2009-01-27 21:12 ` David Teller
2009-01-28 0:32 ` Nicolas Pouillard
2009-01-28 11:25 ` David Teller
2009-01-29 9:37 ` nicolas.pouillard
2009-01-29 10:40 ` David Allsopp
2009-01-29 21:14 ` Mauricio Fernandez
2009-01-30 8:25 ` Michaël Grünewald
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=497DD1F5.7050702@yahoo.fr \
--to=michaelgrunewald@yahoo.fr \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox