From: Christophe Raffalli <christophe.raffalli@univ-savoie.fr>
To: OCaml <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] The Axis of Eval (was: More cores)
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 19:01:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <494BE164.6080803@univ-savoie.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <899271.12846.qm@web111505.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
Dear list members,
> Incidentally, it is of course possible for a function to invoke impure
> functions while still being pure itself (ie, it ensures the impurity
> does not "leak out"). One question to those more familiar with current
> language research: any recommended resources out there about this topic?
>
> Cheers,
> Dario Teixeira
>
>
>
You can easily infer purity (meaning no affectation) of an ocaml
expression using the same algorithm
than for exception (numerous papers on that subkect) ... just tag ":="
and "<-" as being able to raise the fake exception "#Affect" which
can not be catch by any try (because its name starts with a "#") ...
Cheers,
Christophe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-19 17:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-19 13:04 More cores Mikkel Fahnøe Jørgensen
2008-12-19 14:04 ` [Caml-list] " Dario Teixeira
2008-12-19 15:06 ` Alexy Khrabrov
2008-12-19 15:54 ` The Axis of Eval (was: More cores) Dario Teixeira
2008-12-19 16:26 ` [Caml-list] " Paolo Donadeo
2008-12-19 17:01 ` Dario Teixeira
2008-12-19 18:01 ` Christophe Raffalli [this message]
2008-12-19 18:50 ` [Caml-list] More cores Ulf Wiger (TN/EAB)
2008-12-19 19:10 ` Richard Jones
2008-12-19 22:31 ` Jon Harrop
2008-12-19 22:36 ` Erik de Castro Lopo
2008-12-19 22:53 ` Jon Harrop
2008-12-22 17:00 ` [Caml-list] More Caml Jon Harrop
2008-12-22 21:44 ` Richard Jones
2008-12-23 6:07 ` Jon Harrop
2008-12-23 9:59 ` Jon Harrop
2008-12-23 15:32 ` Ashish Agarwal
2008-12-23 17:33 ` Jon Harrop
2008-12-24 13:12 ` Mikkel Fahnøe Jørgensen
2008-12-24 16:47 ` Jon Harrop
2008-12-23 10:04 ` Richard Jones
2008-12-23 10:38 ` Jon Harrop
2008-12-23 9:43 ` Oliver Bandel
2008-12-23 11:53 ` Jon Harrop
2008-12-19 22:42 ` [Caml-list] More cores Richard Jones
2008-12-20 19:33 ` Mikkel Fahnøe Jørgensen
2008-12-20 19:41 ` Mikkel Fahnøe Jørgensen
2008-12-19 20:37 ` Oliver Bandel
2008-12-19 21:27 ` Richard Jones
2008-12-19 22:03 ` Hezekiah M. Carty
2008-12-19 22:47 ` Richard Jones
2008-12-19 23:00 ` Alexy Khrabrov
2008-12-19 23:56 ` prelude.ml as another standard extension to Pervasives? Alexy Khrabrov
2008-12-20 1:40 ` [Caml-list] " Mikkel Fahnøe Jørgensen
2008-12-20 4:50 ` Alexy Khrabrov
2008-12-20 10:53 ` Zheng Li
2008-12-20 12:37 ` [Caml-list] More cores Richard Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=494BE164.6080803@univ-savoie.fr \
--to=christophe.raffalli@univ-savoie.fr \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox