From: Martin Jambon <martin.jambon@ens-lyon.org>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Ocaml 3.01 and camlp4 syntax?
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 02:28:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <491B82B6.3040009@ens-lyon.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081113102217.87faf573.mle+ocaml@mega-nerd.com>
Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Mostly out of curiosity, I'm having a look at the efuns Emacs
> clone written in Ocaml:
>
> http://pauillac.inria.fr/cdrom/prog/unix/efuns/eng.htm
>
> and trying to compile it with a recent Ocaml compiler like 3.10.2.
>
>>From the files, it seems that the last version of Ocaml this code
> compiled with was 3.01 (around the year 2000?). I've managed to find
> fixes for a bunch of problems.
>
> One of those problems was that one of the files (common/options.ml)
> had code like this:
>
> open Genlex
>
> let lexer = make_lexer [ "=" ; "{" ; "}"; "["; "]"; ";" ; "("; ")"; ","; "."]
>
> let rec parse_gwmlrc = parser
> [< id = parse_id; 'Kwd "="; v = parse_option ;
> eof = parse_gwmlrc >] -> (id, v) :: eof
> | [< >] -> []
>
> which the current compiler complained about "[<". A bit of googling
> suggested that this was in fact camlp4 source code. Sure enough,
> renaming that file to pa_options.ml and running it throught camlp4
> resulted in a file that the standard compiler digested quite happily.
>
> I've now come to another file gwml/afterstep.mll that seems to be
> ocamllex source code but again has these camlp4 like extensions.
> Unfortunately camlp4 doesn't like this file, probably because it
> has ocamllex syntax instead of ocaml syntax.
>
> So, I have two questions :
>
> 1) Did early versions of ocaml (say up to and including 3.01) handle
> constructs like those above that were later removed and and added
> to camlp4 instead?
Exactly.
The 3.10 manual says:
7.2 Streams and stream parsers
The syntax for streams and stream parsers is no longer part of the
Objective Caml language, but available through a Camlp4 syntax
extension. See the Camlp4 reference manual for more information. Support
for basic operations on streams is still available through the
Stream[Stream] module of the standard library. Objective Caml programs
that use the stream parser syntax should be compiled with the -pp
camlp4o option to ocamlc and ocamlopt. For interactive use, run ocaml
and issue the #load "camlp4o.cma";; command.
> 2) Any suggestions on how to handle the camlp4 syntax stuff in an
> ocamllex source file? Obviously, this code could be extracted
> and placed in its own file but I'm open to other suggestions.
I don't know. Have you tried ocamllex followed by camlp4?
Martin
--
http://mjambon.com/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-13 1:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-12 23:22 Erik de Castro Lopo
2008-11-13 1:28 ` Martin Jambon [this message]
2008-11-13 4:47 ` [Caml-list] " Erik de Castro Lopo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=491B82B6.3040009@ens-lyon.org \
--to=martin.jambon@ens-lyon.org \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox