From: Zheng Li <zheng_li@users.sourceforge.net>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [ANN] camlish: a simple module for shell scripting in OCaml
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 15:35:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4905D1C7.7090102@users.sourceforge.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <caee5ad80810270702u38e64308wa8ef02a833d57b50@mail.gmail.com>
Mikkel Fahnøe Jørgensen wrote:
>> * The interaction between external commands and OCaml values are
>> implemented asynchronously inside (but with a synchronous
>> interface). So it won't get stuck unnecessarily when dealing with
>> large chunk of input/output.
>
> Would it be possible to combine this with the LWT thread library?
> http://www.ocsigen.org/lwt
I'm not clear what kind of "combine" you had in mind.
* If you meant to use them together, I think that's fine. They
are both user level libraries, Lwt has an asynchronous interface,
camlish has a synchronous one, so you can just use camlish API as
common functions application everywhere.
* If you meant to implement the inside asynchronous mechanics of
camlish on top of Lwt, I did thought of that. Actually, I have
another library called Async does similar thing as Lwt. It's
possible, but not necessary. Besides, the CPS-based approach
always brings some syntactic burdens, which I prefer to avoid.
So finally, the inside implementation of camlish is asynchronous,
while we only expose the synchronous interface to the outside world.
* Maybe you were though about parallel execution? Pipeline is
parallel already, plus there are two parallel combinators have
been planed (opposite to "&&&", the sequential combinator). I
haven't seen this kind of stuff in other shells, but I think that's
reasonable.
HTH.
--
Zheng
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-27 14:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-27 3:30 Zheng Li
2008-10-27 8:51 ` Sylvain Le Gall
2008-10-27 10:09 ` Zheng Li
2008-10-27 13:11 ` [Caml-list] " Mikkel Fahnøe Jørgensen
2008-10-27 13:15 ` Andre Nathan
2008-10-27 13:18 ` Sylvain Le Gall
2008-10-27 13:21 ` [Caml-list] " Andre Nathan
2008-10-27 13:33 ` Sylvain Le Gall
2008-10-27 13:43 ` [Caml-list] " Mikkel Fahnøe Jørgensen
2008-10-27 14:10 ` Zheng Li
2008-10-27 14:02 ` [Caml-list] " Mikkel Fahnøe Jørgensen
2008-10-27 14:35 ` Zheng Li [this message]
[not found] ` <caee5ad80810270745h352a35bye70f9cc045ad441a@mail.gmail.com>
2008-10-27 15:45 ` Zheng Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4905D1C7.7090102@users.sourceforge.net \
--to=zheng_li@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox