From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.8 required=5.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB953BB84 for ; Sun, 17 Aug 2008 03:19:42 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AlYBAJ8Zp0hIDtyejmdsb2JhbACRTT4BAQEBCQMKBw8FmU+GHQECg2s X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.32,222,1217800800"; d="scan'208";a="14038908" Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.158]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 17 Aug 2008 03:19:42 +0200 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l27so1602940fgb.43 for ; Sat, 16 Aug 2008 18:19:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:openpgp:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :sender; bh=wUkiHJ9Ms1BgBQ94zzTm6YyTTZOo+bK1ZZk3llBeX18=; b=SldQ5j1PWNiErwVrd2hAVr/NSqNHymGu+KkXp6dMX67TM3gqk6puuLqv/1eX3/xekT +U5kbT1CHKFJxXb+SuVRIZVc5M54FeTXuV/HW8fBDQhYqzJ+5jbOxWtR4EBJJOR+yr35 INMSVe9RtOZ/utmwCPjMdn4klqlKGs1jrEL3g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:openpgp:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:sender; b=W6DZIPZGkMZP58ReDWD5ljKshoEKRhZA+aEnaR6gholSAFLDwWuA2IQtayR3IUfe9X dM9TjZlTf1DQWICgaZOnB/EnQ9Is0EyVH+gB/IWhx7Mt7IbMpxlrZLqMDLhK/VZhow4o bE5p0dtaSVJNzYnb+bz6HeYI09b2qoYSwEV7s= Received: by 10.86.31.18 with SMTP id e18mr3358712fge.52.1218935981341; Sat, 16 Aug 2008 18:19:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?87.10.206.207? ( [87.10.206.207]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d4sm961976fga.8.2008.08.16.18.19.39 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 16 Aug 2008 18:19:40 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <48A77823.808@gnu.org> Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 03:00:19 +0200 From: Luca Saiu User-Agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080724) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jon Harrop Cc: Nicolas Pouillard , caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Haskell vs OCaml References: <200808142216.26328.jon@ffconsultancy.com> <1218750570-sup-7635@ausone.local> <200808150115.18531.jon@ffconsultancy.com> In-Reply-To: <200808150115.18531.jon@ffconsultancy.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 OpenPGP: id=26C5D286; url=http://www-lipn.univ-paris13.fr/~saiu/lucasaiu.asc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: Luca SAIU X-Spam: no; 0.00; haskell:01 ocaml:01 hash:01 ocaml:01 13.:98 wrote:01 wrote:01 caml-list:01 btw:03 algorithms:03 gnu:03 gnu:03 luca:04 luca:04 informal:04 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jon Harrop wrote: > On Thursday 14 August 2008 22:50:19 you wrote: >> I'm talking about the informal algorithms, their independent of that kind >> of things... > > Yes, that may well be true. I think we would need in-depth knowledge of Darcs > to be able to distinguish between the two. > > Do any OCaml projects use Darcs, BTW? We use Darcs as the VCS for Marionnet. See http://darcs.marionnet.org . Darcs 2 has yet to give us any headache; the "exponential merge" corner cases of version 1 are apparently gone, and now it's quite a pleasure to use. - -- Luca Saiu http://www-lipn.univ-paris13.fr/~saiu GNU epsilon: http://www.gnu.org/software/epsilon Marionnet: http://www.marionnet.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkineB4ACgkQvzOavibF0oYvqQCeMXMygLIy46MFhFJqmOU8n6qJ kDwAn3xb+Ezu6Ky/cdZPgKFLNM/0bVBN =rOZh -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----