From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3863BB84 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 19:26:02 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ah4CAJCdjUigISwplmdsb2JhbACLF4c2AQEBAQkFCBibZg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.31,266,1215381600"; d="scan'208";a="27754711" Received: from discorde.inria.fr ([192.93.2.38]) by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 28 Jul 2008 19:26:02 +0200 Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105]) by discorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m6SHPxh3015582 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 19:26:02 +0200 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ah4CAJCdjUigISwplmdsb2JhbACLF4c2AQEBAQkFCBibZg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.31,266,1215381600"; d="scan'208";a="27754707" Received: from unknown (HELO ironport01a.scea.com) ([160.33.44.41]) by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 28 Jul 2008 19:25:59 +0200 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.31,266,1215414000"; d="scan'208";a="5084420" Received: from inbetweener02.scea.com ([160.33.45.196]) by ironport01a.scea.com with ESMTP; 28 Jul 2008 10:25:55 -0700 Received: from postal1-dog.naughtydog.com (intmail.naughtydog.com [10.15.0.14]) by inbetweener02.scea.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A671B8188; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 10:25:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([150.0.6.116]) by postal1-dog.naughtydog.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 28 Jul 2008 10:24:40 -0700 Message-ID: <488E010C.6060606@naughtydog.com> Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 10:25:32 -0700 From: Pal-Kristian Engstad Reply-To: pal_engstad@naughtydog.com User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Richard Jones Cc: Doctor Trisha Subject: Re: [Caml-list] New Ocaml Plug-in for NetBeans References: <18587175.post@talk.nabble.com> <1216802534.4886eee6211e8@webmail.inescporto.pt> <18606458.post@talk.nabble.com> <200807260056.26888.jon@ffconsultancy.com> <20080726090909.GB24428@annexia.org> In-Reply-To: <20080726090909.GB24428@annexia.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Jul 2008 17:24:40.0885 (UTC) FILETIME=[D1848650:01C8F0D6] X-Miltered: at discorde with ID 488E0127.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 emacs:01 emacs:01 ocaml:01 pke:01 plug-in:98 dog:98 wrote:01 compile:01 caml-list:01 hacker:02 graphics:02 pal-kristian:03 everyday:96 engstad:04 Richard Jones wrote: > I'm sure you know why, but because (a) it's a huge amount of work and > (b) the sort of people who can do the work already use emacs so they > don't need it. > Actually, as a regular Emacs hacker myself, I checked out .NET's F# environment and I must confess that I was quite impressed. It is actually really neat. Instead of the usual edit, M-x compile, M-x next-error cycle, the code is compiled in the background creating "squigglies" under code that has errors. Using this and the Intelli-sense completion features is very nice and I wish we could have the equivalent under Emacs. (Of course, though those features still won't detract me from my everyday daily use of Emacs.) Perhaps some OCaml/Emacs hackers could work together on a system where emacs and the ocaml communicates better? Thanks, PKE. -- Pål-Kristian Engstad (engstad@naughtydog.com), Lead Graphics & Engine Programmer, Naughty Dog, Inc., 1601 Cloverfield Blvd, 6000 North, Santa Monica, CA 90404, USA. Ph.: (310) 633-9112. "Most of us would do well to remember that there is a reason Carmack is Carmack, and we are not Carmack.", Jonathan Blow, 2/1/2006, GD Algo Mailing List