From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,MISSING_HEADERS, SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A835BC6C for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 14:31:17 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAAAILoEfAXQInh2dsb2JhbACQJwEBAQgKKZ8u X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,277,1199660400"; d="scan'208";a="6742961" Received: from concorde.inria.fr ([192.93.2.39]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 30 Jan 2008 14:31:17 +0100 Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m0UDVEAO029672 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 14:31:17 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ao8CAO8KoEfAI/YJ/2dsb2JhbACwFA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,277,1199660400"; d="scan'208";a="7429781" Received: from bart.inescn.pt ([192.35.246.9]) by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 30 Jan 2008 14:31:14 +0100 Received: from localhost (bart.inescn.pt [127.0.0.1]) by bart.inescn.pt (8.13.8/8.13.8/5) with ESMTP id m0UDVCx5005054 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 13:31:12 GMT X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at inescporto.pt Received: from bart.inescn.pt ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bart.inescn.pt [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id wkG+DJDToMpm for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 13:30:51 +0000 (WET) Received: from [194.117.30.117] (merlinix.inescn.pt [194.117.30.117]) by bart.inescn.pt (8.13.8/8.13.8/38) with ESMTP id m0UDUnjN005037 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 13:30:49 GMT Message-ID: <47A07C0A.6090701@inescporto.pt> Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 13:30:50 +0000 From: Hugo Ferreira User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071022) MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: Caml-list List Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Suggestion References: <479FDA69.2060105@functionality.de> <20080130132544.GC3921@snarc.org> In-Reply-To: <20080130132544.GC3921@snarc.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 47A07C22.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 wrote:01 wrote:01 caml-list:01 caml-list:01 groups:02 suggestion:03 wed:06 vincent:07 seem:08 hugo:14 does:14 issues:14 using:15 jan:15 Vincent Hanquez wrote: > On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 02:01:13AM +0000, Thomas Fischbacher wrote: >> Considering the noticeable increase in traffic on this list which does >> not seem to be about to decline, may I suggest splitting it into >> caml-impl (dealing with language implementation issues only) and >> caml-list? > > yes, it was so much better when that was dead (!) > How about using the ocaml developer list at google groups? (ocaml-developer@googlegroups.com)