From: Arnaud Spiwack <Arnaud.Spiwack@lix.polytechnique.fr>
To: Dario Teixeira <darioteixeira@yahoo.com>
Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Type_of?
Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2008 18:43:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <477FC1DC.701@lix.polytechnique.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <712252.79789.qm@web54603.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
Hello,
How about giving it a name ?
For instance:
type 'a make_doc_type = 'a XHTML.M.elt list
constraint 'a = [< `Address | `Blockquote | `Del | `Div | `Dl |
`Fieldset | `Form | `H1 | `H2 | `H3 | `H4 | `H5 | `H6 | `Hr | `Ins |
`Noscript | `Ol | `P | `PCDATA | `Pre | `Script | `Table | `Ul >
`Blockquote `H1 `P ]
(this is untested, might contain a few dozens syntax errors, but it's
the idea).
Arnaud Spiwack
Dario Teixeira a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I'm using the XHTML.M module from the Ocsigen project to generate valid
> XHTML pages. It makes heavy use of polymorphic variants, and as such the
> types produced can be quite verbose and complex. In practice, however, one
> is rarely confronted with them (thank goodness for latent typing and type
> inference!). There is one exception, though: when unmarshalling, one must
> explicitly provide the return type. And this is the context for my question.
>
> So, imagine I have a module with only two functions. The first, "make_doc",
> uses XHTML.M and its signature is therefore quite complex. This is what
> "ocamlc -i" tells me:
>
> val make_doc: string ->
> [< `Address | `Blockquote | `Del | `Div | `Dl | `Fieldset | `Form | `H1
> | `H2 | `H3 | `H4 | `H5 | `H6 | `Hr | `Ins | `Noscript | `Ol | `P |
> `PCDATA
> | `Pre | `Script | `Table | `Ul > `Blockquote `H1 `P ]
> XHTML.M.elt list
>
>
> The second function, "unpickle_doc", uses the Marshal module to deserialise
> from a string a previously pickled doc. This is the definition of this
> function: (note that I've used copy & paste of the previous output of
> "ocamlc -i" to provide the explicit type annotation)
>
> let unpickle_doc str :
> [< `Address | `Blockquote | `Del | `Div | `Dl | `Fieldset | `Form | `H1
> | `H2 | `H3 | `H4 | `H5 | `H6 | `Hr | `Ins | `Noscript | `Ol | `P |
> `PCDATA
> | `Pre | `Script | `Table | `Ul > `Blockquote `H1 `P ]
> XHTML.M.elt list
> = Marshal.from_string str 0
>
>
> Now, this works fine. It is however error prone, since if the signature
> of make_doc changes somewhat and I forget to update the type annotation in
> unpickle_doc, then I get a nasty runtime segfault. So this is my question:
> since the return type of make_doc is known at compile-time, is there any
> way I can tell the compiler that the return type of unpickle_doc should be
> the same as make_doc's?
>
> Thank you for your help!
> Dario Teixeira
>
>
>
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________
> Support the World Aids Awareness campaign this month with Yahoo! For Good http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/forgood/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management:
> http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list
> Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-05 17:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-05 16:41 Type_of? Dario Teixeira
2008-01-05 17:12 ` [Caml-list] Type_of? Jeremy Yallop
2008-01-05 17:43 ` Arnaud Spiwack [this message]
2008-01-05 20:33 ` Type_of? Zheng Li
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-04-18 9:18 type of == Christophe DEHLINGER
2005-04-18 11:27 ` [Caml-list] " Jon Harrop
2005-04-18 12:11 ` Andreas Rossberg
2005-04-18 13:10 ` Christophe DEHLINGER
2005-04-18 14:28 ` Jon Harrop
2005-04-18 16:16 ` Remi Vanicat
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=477FC1DC.701@lix.polytechnique.fr \
--to=arnaud.spiwack@lix.polytechnique.fr \
--cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
--cc=darioteixeira@yahoo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox