Mailing list for all users of the OCaml language and system.
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Shaw <shawjef3@msu.edu>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: restricting and hiding record fields for functors
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2008 03:24:33 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <477DED41.3040009@msu.edu> (raw)

Hello. I searched through the Google archives of this list, so I 
apologize if I missed something relevant.

I'm working on a project that uses record types, perhaps

module type Cordinate = sig
  type ordinate
  type point2d = {x : ordinate; y : ordinate;}

  val distance : point2d -> float
end

Now I have a functor over modules that match the signature Coordinate, 
but I want to allow the modules given to the functor to have things in 
the record "point2d" besides just x and y. It seems the types in this 
case are really clear and there shouldn't be any ambiguity (but I'm no 
expert).

As it is now, to use such records I have to entirely hide their contents 
so that the type checker doesn't complain when "point2d" contains extra 
fields. In addition, any fields I need access to in the functor will 
have an associated function for setting and getting the values. For 
instance,

module type Cordinate1 = sig
  type ordinate
  type point2d
  val setx : ordinal -> point2d -> point2d
  val sety : ordinal -> point2d -> point2d
  val makepoint : ordinal -> ordinal -> point2d
  val getx : point2d -> ordinate
  val gety : point2d -> ordinate
  val getpoint : point2d -> ordinate * ordinate

  val distance : point2d -> float
end

This is really quite ugly. I would rather be able to have x and y in the 
signature and get rid of get/set functions. But then you can't have 
extra fields. You can't, for instance, hide them via a signature.

Or perhaps I'm missing some simple technique? Please let me know.

Thanks,
Jeff


             reply	other threads:[~2008-01-04  8:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-01-04  8:24 Jeff Shaw [this message]
2008-01-04 10:09 ` [Caml-list] " Keiko Nakata

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=477DED41.3040009@msu.edu \
    --to=shawjef3@msu.edu \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox