From: Andrej Bauer <Andrej.Bauer@fmf.uni-lj.si>
To: Arnaud Spiwack <Arnaud.Spiwack@lix.polytechnique.fr>,
caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Coq 8.1 and Ocaml 3.10
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 22:57:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47605953.5000509@fmf.uni-lj.si> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47601B45.5090503@lix.polytechnique.fr>
Arnaud Spiwack wrote:
> This bug seems to have nothing to do with camlp4/5. I've seen this bug
> twice before, with two different version of OCaml (3.09.3 and 3.09.2
> namely), but always Coq 8.1pl2. It's rare, and I have no clue why they
> occur.
I don't insist, I just want a Coq which doesn't think that semirings
satisfy the cancelation law for addition (since I care about
distributive lattices, which are semirings without a cancelation law).
> One solution is to move to the trunk version of Coq (whose Makefile has
> been reengineered, and is far less surprising).
Will try an older version of Coq first. Thanks for the advice. I just
wanted to hear from someone that Coq was "Ocaml 3.10 ready".
Andrej
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-12 21:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-12 17:21 Andrej Bauer
2007-12-12 17:28 ` [Caml-list] " Daniel de Rauglaudre
2007-12-12 17:32 ` Arnaud Spiwack
2007-12-12 21:57 ` Andrej Bauer [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47605953.5000509@fmf.uni-lj.si \
--to=andrej.bauer@fmf.uni-lj.si \
--cc=Andrej.Bauer@andrej.com \
--cc=Arnaud.Spiwack@lix.polytechnique.fr \
--cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox