From: Thomas Fischbacher <tf@functionality.de>
To: Andrej.Bauer@andrej.com
Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] caml and python
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 16:21:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4745AC7A.1050909@functionality.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47459E87.4000504@fmf.uni-lj.si>
Andrej,
> thank you for your reply. I did not realize you actually married python
> and ocaml so closely.
Well, we sort-of had to.
> My inquiry was actually geared towards getting some sort of
> Mathematica-like front-end environment that could link to a
> computational "core" (or cores) running as separate processes. Are there
> any pooor man's frontends out there? I am aware of Texmacs and Sage.
> Texmacs strikes me a bit idiosyncratic, while Sage scares me in sheer
> size. I just want a nice little general-purpose frontend that can do an
> interactive loop and show pictures and math formulas as results.
I have played around with Texmacs myself a few years ago, but considered
it way too weak for heavy-duty applications. I think that if visualizing
maths in a front-end is your main concern, you may be better off hooking
up the computational core to a webserver and use a web-browser as your
front-end. Then, you can think about MathML rendering and a JavaScript
or even Java-based user interface. (Concerning Java, it is rather
convenient to write Java applets in Per Bothner's Kawa Scheme rather
than in Java.) This can be a very convenient approach provided you have
full continuation support in your computational core.
Here is a prototype for a webbrowser-as-maths-user-interface I wrote
a few years ago (taking mzscheme as a basis, as this provides call/cc):
http://141.84.136.30:8000/
The preprint thaat describes the idea is here:
http://de.arxiv.org/abs/cs/0406002
The original motivation for a pattern-language based term manipulation
tool came from supergravity, where you have to do a lot of nasty
("fierzing") tensor and spinor algebra. However, I never found the
time to evolve this idea into a really useful tool for that particular
job. A more reasonable first goal for a demo application would be the
formalism of partial derivatives used in thermodynamics.
--
best regards,
Thomas Fischbacher
tf@functionality.de
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-22 16:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-21 19:06 Announcement: ocaml-based magnetism simulation package Thomas Fischbacher
2007-11-21 19:47 ` [Caml-list] " Jon Harrop
2007-11-21 20:03 ` Thomas Fischbacher
2007-11-21 22:02 ` Andrej Bauer
2007-11-21 23:33 ` [Caml-list] caml and python (was: Announcement: ocaml-based magnetism simulation package) Thomas Fischbacher
2007-11-22 15:21 ` [Caml-list] caml and python Andrej Bauer
2007-11-22 16:21 ` Thomas Fischbacher [this message]
2007-11-22 16:32 ` Jon Harrop
2007-11-22 16:19 ` [Caml-list] caml and python (was: Announcement: ocaml-based magnetism simulation package) Stefano Zacchiroli
2007-11-22 18:06 ` [Caml-list] caml and python Thomas Fischbacher
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4745AC7A.1050909@functionality.de \
--to=tf@functionality.de \
--cc=Andrej.Bauer@andrej.com \
--cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox