From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 053B1BC6B for ; Sat, 10 Nov 2007 06:40:29 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAAP7SNEfAXQInh2dsb2JhbACPAgEBAQgKKQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.21,397,1188770400"; d="scan'208";a="19132075" Received: from concorde.inria.fr ([192.93.2.39]) by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 10 Nov 2007 06:40:26 +0100 Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id lAA5eTqr025551 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=OK) for ; Sat, 10 Nov 2007 06:40:29 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAAP7SNEdC+VLmmGdsb2JhbACPAgEBAQEHBAQJChg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.21,397,1188770400"; d="scan'208";a="4265763" Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.230]) by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 10 Nov 2007 06:40:28 +0100 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id h28so594162wxd for ; Fri, 09 Nov 2007 21:40:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=nGm50nHPVctvuI7FmbhKrmae02bHmvl7KXxVPTlDO04=; b=py6sjU91THaEVlzwqED0yWDwMNIU3ZrSm2G/NEfgQUQSEYLrV/ggcfsXlVcdYezMaoBm1T6edqz+nWGnIHYzjiOGmJIbr7I5npacukTyF4hjgWVyzbpL9JLLCA4gvdysurq4/r3oJns6K1/dKSljOjx57/jEsPm1Uq99I9DZHX4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=I2B+oxRHEn0wj8GgNue2V/dRAKIA/wb/ae8u7aMHmNLEk1F/uGx4XHjn5jEuh+C+PbLy2Ylh+Byfx0aGB0tui0ST6rlM1G9hmf4ltuuKBtSfzYOlI0z7RJZsffgxuoHekO92B3j2cvxxxJrYAKHLXR+WNqFvORz1hscN5n8jsxk= Received: by 10.70.40.3 with SMTP id n3mr2335523wxn.1194673226672; Fri, 09 Nov 2007 21:40:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.0.7? ( [69.152.94.247]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o61sm1537565hsc.2007.11.09.21.40.24 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 09 Nov 2007 21:40:25 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <47354446.3090100@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2007 23:40:22 -0600 From: Edgar Friendly User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joel Reymont Cc: Gerd Stolpmann , Mika Illouz , caml-list Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Wink releases caching library References: <1194640344.19355.43.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4734E3E9.3040501@gmail.com> <9ED9BF56-2719-4BAA-81CF-29E36C4A5C54@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <9ED9BF56-2719-4BAA-81CF-29E36C4A5C54@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 4735444D.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; caching:01 hash:01 async:01 prepend:01 edgar:98 wrote:01 caml-list:01 data:02 append:02 modifies:02 seems:03 library:03 entries:05 loading:05 modify:05 Joel Reymont wrote: > That's the essence of my question. I assume it wouldn't have taken long > to write a memcached client but Wink chose to write a less featured > memcached of their own. I really wonder why. > It does seem to have features that memcached doesn't. For example: * saving the cache to disk (and, I assume, loading it on startup) * undelete of entries scheduled for deletion on modify * get if: modified < x, data_hash != x (otherwise not found) * async requests It seems to lack: * append/prepend insertion-into-cache commands * increment/decrement modifies 64-bit counters in the cache * UDP protocol support E.