From: Jeremy Yallop <jeremy.yallop@ed.ac.uk>
To: Till Varoquaux <till.varoquaux@gmail.com>
Cc: caml-list <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Search for the smallest possible possible Ocaml segfault....
Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2007 16:11:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4733352B.60008@ed.ac.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47333433.40401@ed.ac.uk>
Jeremy Yallop wrote:
> Till Varoquaux wrote:
>> I have a open bug in ocaml
>> (http://caml.inria.fr/mantis/view.php?id=4321) that leads very simply
>> to a segfault. The bug has been there for more than 4 months and is
>> still marked as "new". Since it seems to be stalling I thought I might
>> give it a gentle prod: what is the smallest possible ocaml program you
>> can come up with that leads to a reproducible segfault without using
>> FFI's Obj or Marshal. Here is mine:
>>
>> Scanf.sscanf "\"%2$c%1$s\"" "%{%c%s%}" (fun f->Printf.printf f 'x'
>> "xy");;
>
> I've already reported this (on the mailing list) and it's probably been
> fixed by now, but in OCaml 3.10.0:
>
> !((object val virtual x:'a method x=x end)#x)
I made it shorter:
!((object val virtual x:_ method x=x end)#x)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-08 16:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-08 14:17 Till Varoquaux
2007-11-08 15:00 ` [Caml-list] " Jean-Christophe Filliâtre
2007-11-08 15:17 ` Till Varoquaux
2007-11-08 15:55 ` Adrien
2007-11-08 16:05 ` Alain Frisch
2007-11-08 16:30 ` Feature request (was Re: [Caml-list] Search for the smallest possible possible Ocaml segfault....) Martin Jambon
2007-11-08 18:23 ` Martin Jambon
2007-11-08 16:07 ` [Caml-list] Search for the smallest possible possible Ocaml segfault Jeremy Yallop
2007-11-08 16:11 ` Jeremy Yallop [this message]
2007-11-08 16:17 ` Till Varoquaux
2007-11-08 17:02 ` Stefano Zacchiroli
2007-11-08 17:10 ` Till Varoquaux
2007-11-08 17:02 ` Pascal Zimmer
2007-11-08 17:12 ` Oliver Bandel
2007-11-08 17:11 ` Oliver Bandel
2007-11-08 17:13 ` Zheng Li
2007-11-08 17:55 ` [Caml-list] STOP (was: Search for the smallest possible possible Ocaml segfault) Xavier Leroy
2007-11-08 18:11 ` Tom Primožič
2007-11-08 18:23 ` [Caml-list] STOP Robert Fischer
2007-11-08 19:01 ` Basile STARYNKEVITCH
2007-11-08 18:31 ` [Caml-list] STOP (was: Search for the smallest possible possible Ocaml segfault) Till Varoquaux
2007-11-08 19:06 ` Oliver Bandel
2007-11-09 18:09 ` Pierre Weis
2007-11-10 14:32 ` OCaml's formatting libraries Bünzli Daniel
2007-11-10 14:58 ` [Caml-list] " Jon Harrop
2007-11-10 15:43 ` Bünzli Daniel
2007-11-10 19:13 ` Jon Harrop
2007-11-13 9:22 ` Pierre Weis
2007-11-13 9:13 ` Pierre Weis
2007-11-13 8:53 ` Pierre Weis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4733352B.60008@ed.ac.uk \
--to=jeremy.yallop@ed.ac.uk \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=till.varoquaux@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox