From: Matt Gushee <matt@gushee.net>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: A labltk book?
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 18:36:34 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47155912.6010403@gushee.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200710151830.52306.jon@ffconsultancy.com>
Jon Harrop wrote:
> On Monday 15 October 2007 17:42:39 Jeff Shaw wrote:
>> This thread was quite derailed... should I then assume there's very
>> little interest in such a book?
>
> I think there would be far more interest in an introductory book on OCaml
> published as cheaply as possible through someone like O'Reilly, that includes
> a chapter on GUI programming. Or a IDE that makes it as easy as possible to
> get started with OCaml that might be written using Tk.
Could be ... some time ago (2 years, maybe?) I proposed the idea of (me)
writing a book on LablTk; there was very little response, favorable or
otherwise, but at least one person thought it would be nice to have a
book on GUI programming in OCaml, perhaps including LablTk but with
greater emphasis on LablGTK. Even if I had agreed with the idea, at that
time I had little experience with (Labl)GTK. But I don't agree with the
idea: you could write a book about GUI *design*, but that should be
neither toolkit-specific nor language-specific. On the other hand, a
book about GUI programming techniques in a specific language will
probably appeal mainly to people with specific projects in mind, which
implies that they probably want to learn one good GUI toolkit ... which
in the case of OCaml would have to be LablGTK.
I realize Tk is progressing and making some much-wanted improvements,
but to me it seems like too little, too late.
As for Jon's idea, sure, great! But I wonder if any major publisher
would take it on. After all, O'Reilly *has* an introductory OCaml book;
it would need to be updated and translated, but that's still much easier
than creating a new one. Yet they don't seem interested in doing that.
So some brave soul might have to self-publish something.
--
Matt Gushee
: Bantam - lightweight file manager : matt.gushee.net/software/bantam/ :
: RASCL's A Simple Configuration Language : matt.gushee.net/rascl/ :
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-17 0:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-15 16:42 Jeff Shaw
2007-10-15 17:30 ` [Caml-list] " Jon Harrop
2007-10-17 0:36 ` Matt Gushee [this message]
2007-10-17 2:33 ` skaller
2007-10-18 4:17 ` Jon Harrop
2007-10-18 3:18 ` Dave Benjamin
2007-10-18 4:19 ` Jon Harrop
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-10-12 22:23 Jeff Shaw
2007-10-15 1:42 ` [Caml-list] " Matt Gushee
2007-10-15 8:01 ` Christoph Bauer
2007-10-15 8:19 ` Jon Harrop
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47155912.6010403@gushee.net \
--to=matt@gushee.net \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox