From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,SPF_FAIL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAF9DBC69 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2007 21:32:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mx1.wp.pl (mx1.wp.pl [212.77.101.5]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l7VJWa1q018591 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2007 21:32:39 +0200 Received: (wp-smtpd smtp.wp.pl 22850 invoked from network); 31 Aug 2007 21:32:36 +0200 Received: from lan.2-0.pl (HELO [91.189.18.163]) (d0@[91.189.16.22]) (envelope-sender ) by smtp.wp.pl (WP-SMTPD) with SMTP for ; 31 Aug 2007 21:32:36 +0200 X-Nat-Received: from [91.189.18.163]:1341 [ident-empty] by smtp-proxy.2-0.pl with TPROXY id 1188588755.478 Message-ID: <46D86CC1.5090801@wp.pl> Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 21:32:17 +0200 From: Dawid Toton User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] MingW compiler (!) and Ocaml for Windows Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-WP-AV: skaner antywirusowy poczty Wirtualnej Polski S. A. X-WP-SPAM: NO 0000000 X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 46D86CD4.002 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; mingw:01 compiler:01 ocaml:01 occuring:01 lablgtk:01 invocation:01 ocamlopt:01 cygwin:01 caml-list:01 short:01 compiling:02 native:03 parameters:03 problem:05 problem:05 > If on the other side problems with "@responsefile" are only occuring > in more rare situation -- can anybody tell me how to provoke the > problem? I was compiling an application using LablGTK to native code (using MSYS). AFAIR the linker invocation contained quite long list of libraries and ocamlopt decided to use responsefile. I got some incomprehensible error message (and only then discovered that I have to use Cygwin tools). I have no idea whether the problem with MSYS tools still persists. When command parameters were short enough they worked seamlessly. Dawid Toton