From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE, DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60B70BC6C for ; Sat, 4 Aug 2007 12:58:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from resmaa06.ono.com (smtp.ono.com [62.42.230.12]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l74AwnnS007283 for ; Sat, 4 Aug 2007 12:58:50 +0200 Received: from [192.168.1.33] (83.34.178.87) by resmaa06.ono.com (7.3.118.8) (authenticated as tmp123@menta.net) id 46AEFB3F0019B404 for caml-list@yquem.inria.fr; Sat, 4 Aug 2007 12:58:43 +0200 Message-ID: <46B45BE3.9040403@menta.net> Date: Sat, 04 Aug 2007 12:58:43 +0200 From: tmp123@menta.net User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Warning on not-tail recursive functions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 46B45BE9.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; recursive:01 ocamlopt:01 recursive:01 functions:01 tail:01 assembler:02 optimization:03 generated:05 generated:05 jmp:05 tmp:05 probably:07 function:08 function:08 correct:08 Hello, Please, knows someone if "ocamlopt" can print a warning message when a recursive function is not tail recursive, and code with the "jmp" optimization has not been generated?. In this case, probably I can correct the function implementation to write a better one. Without it, I must always look at the generated assembler to check it. Thanks a lot.