From: Sam Steingold <sds@gnu.org>
To: tmp123@menta.net
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: Execution time of class versus record
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 09:35:04 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46811608.5080707@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <467E8A6E.9050700@menta.net>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
tmp123@menta.net wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've tried to implement two equivalent small programs, the one using
> class, the other one using records. The resulting execution times says
> that class are 7-8 times slower than record (compiled with ocamlopt in a
> Intel machine).
As other have explained, classes use hash table lookup per slot access,
while records access fields by offsets computed at compile-time.
> Please, knows someone what I'm doing wrong?
> let t0 = Unix.gettimeofday () in
> Printf.printf "elapsed = %f\n" (Unix.gettimeofday() -. t0)
Unix.gettimeofday is "wall clock".
Unix.times is "CPU time".
use the latter to time your programs because the former depends on the
machine load at the time of the test while the latter does not.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFGgRYIPp1Qsf2qnMcRAiC5AJkBPG/XrrH3mSZuP+YFTtLk+xF4YACdGmdF
zijSDKnxkm6BIpXDQ+DkLwE=
=lchS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-26 13:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-24 15:14 tmp123
2007-06-24 15:29 ` [Caml-list] " Jon Harrop
2007-06-24 15:48 ` Till Varoquaux
2007-06-24 16:06 ` Arnaud Spiwack
2007-06-24 18:18 ` skaller
2007-06-24 18:29 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2007-06-24 18:51 ` Arnaud Spiwack
2007-06-24 19:11 ` Chris King
2007-06-25 3:25 ` Jon Harrop
2007-06-25 11:16 ` Arnaud Spiwack
2007-06-25 12:07 ` Jon Harrop
2007-06-25 23:59 ` Jonathan Bryant
2007-06-26 0:15 ` Chris King
2007-06-26 6:53 ` Loup Vaillant
2007-06-26 7:02 ` Jon Harrop
2007-06-26 17:07 ` Loup Vaillant
2007-06-28 1:13 ` Christian Stork
2007-06-26 13:35 ` Sam Steingold [this message]
2007-06-26 16:29 ` [Caml-list] " Quôc Peyrot
2007-06-24 15:18 tmp123
2007-06-24 15:20 tmp123
[not found] <20070626065522.6175FBC77@yquem.inria.fr>
2007-06-26 7:36 ` David Allsopp
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46811608.5080707@gnu.org \
--to=sds@gnu.org \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=tmp123@menta.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox