* camlp4: let binding
@ 2007-04-05 10:59 Hugo Ferreira
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Hugo Ferreira @ 2007-04-05 10:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: caml-list
Hello,
I would like to use a reserved word and substitute that by a function
call. For example, the following:
let _ = HEAP in
let h1 = HEAP in
would become
let __heap = new_heap () in
let h1 = new_heap () in
To do this I attempted (here I am not checking the identifier name):
binding: [
[ v = LIDENT ; "=" ; "HEAP" -> <:expr<$lid:v$ = new_heap ()>> ]
] ;
My problem however is how to activate the rule above? I figured I need
something like:
Pcaml.str_item : LEVEL "top" [
[ "let"; OPT "rec";
l = LIST1 binding SEP "and" ; "in" ->
<str_item:< declare $list:l$ end>>
]
];
But this doesn't even compile. I then concentrated on using Pcaml's
let_binding function and see If I could simply reconstruct the
structured expression but failed. I also tried:
Pcaml.expr: LEVEL "expr1" [
[
"let"; l = LIST1 Pcaml.let_binding SEP "and" ; "in" -> <:expr<$l$>>
Here I get the error:
This expression has type (MLast.patt * MLast.expr) list
but is here used with type MLast.expr
Now I realize that my problem is (re)constructing the expression of a
let binding. I have been at this since yesterday and cannot find a
solution. Does anyone have an example of how to do this?
TIA,
Hugo Ferreira.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2007-04-05 11:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-04-05 10:59 camlp4: let binding Hugo Ferreira
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox