From: christian konrad <konrad@in.tum.de>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Question about try.. with
Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 19:11:42 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45D8EB3E.7010002@in.tum.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070218.181909.64993949.garrigue@math.nagoya-u.ac.jp>
Thanks for all those hints. For the future I will use the beginners
list, thank you.
But that seams really strange not to have a strictly defined order of
evaluation. Isn't that really bad if one would like to do some tail
recursion to get it compiled without recursion but as a loop?
Thanks and cheers,
Chris
Jacques Garrigue wrote:
>From: christian konrad <konrad@in.tum.de>
>
>
>
>>I'm doing that:
>>
>>let _ =
>> try
>> let infile = open_in !filename in
>> let rec readIn () =
>> try
>> (input_line infile) ^ readIn();
>> with ee -> "";
>> in
>> print_string(readIn () );
>> "good";
>> with e -> "";;
>>
>>So why don't I get any output at all? Doesn't "with" erease the raised
>>Exception?
>>
>>
>
>Because you assume wrongly that input_line will be called before the
>recursive call to readIn. Nothing in the ocaml specification says so
>(evaluation order is left undefined.) In practice the rightmost call
>is done first, which is the recursive call here, but you shouldn't
>depend on it either.
>By the way, it is a bad idea to catch all exceptions. ee should be
>End_of_file and e should be Sys_error _.
>
>Jacques Garrigue
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-19 0:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-17 23:40 christian konrad
2007-02-18 0:37 ` [Caml-list] " Jon Harrop
2007-02-18 1:01 ` Geoffrey Romer
2007-02-18 9:20 ` Christophe TROESTLER
2007-02-18 9:19 ` Jacques Garrigue
2007-02-19 0:11 ` christian konrad [this message]
2007-02-19 9:16 ` Andrej Bauer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45D8EB3E.7010002@in.tum.de \
--to=konrad@in.tum.de \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox