From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_HEADERS autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28798BC0C for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2006 23:18:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtphost.cis.strath.ac.uk (smtphost.cis.strath.ac.uk [130.159.196.96]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kASMI1aO012462 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2006 23:18:01 +0100 Received: from [10.0.0.17] ([89.240.222.197]) by smtphost.cis.strath.ac.uk (8.13.4/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id kASMHjE5019163 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2006 22:17:46 GMT Message-ID: <456CB594.4090401@cis.strath.ac.uk> Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 22:17:56 +0000 From: Peter Gregory User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] [ANN] Cameleon 1.9.17 References: <20061128141151.79ab54da@tintin.inria.fr> In-Reply-To: <20061128141151.79ab54da@tintin.inria.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CIS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-CIS-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=0.095, required 6, autolearn=disabled, AWL -0.10, MISSING_HEADERS 0.19) X-CIS-MailScanner-From: pg@cis.strath.ac.uk X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 456CB599.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; cameleon:01 maxence:01 guesdon:01 cameleon:01 cygwin:01 config:01 wrote:01 caml-list:01 anybody:07 cis:08 release:08 i'm:09 i'm:09 messing:10 peter:11 Maxence Guesdon wrote: > Hello, > > I'm pleased to announce the release 1.9.17 of Cameleon. > Hi, Has anybody had any luck building this for Windows/ Cygwin? I've been messing about with the config files for a while, but I'm ready to admit defeat now. That's unless someone else has had more luck ;) Thanks, Peter.