* non-recursive recursive module segfault
@ 2006-08-09 13:51 Jeremy Yallop
2006-08-09 14:30 ` [Caml-list] " Alain Frisch
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jeremy Yallop @ 2006-08-09 13:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: caml-list
What behaviour should I expect for the following code? :
module rec M :
sig
val m : unit -> unit
end
=
struct
let h _ _ = ()
let m = h ()
end
let _ = M.m ()
According to the documentation this could trigger the exception
"Undefined_recursive_module", but instead it segfaults. If I remove the
`rec' keyword then it "works", i.e. simply returns unit.
I was rather hoping that M would be treated as a non-recursive module,
despite the `rec', since it's not actually recursive. It's easy enough
to avoid the segmentation fault: eta-expanding m, adding a trivial value
component to the signature, removing `rec', etc., but I was hoping the
compiler would help out in this case.
In any case, should the segmentation fault be considered a bug?
This is on OCaml 3.09.2/Linux/x86.
Jeremy.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [Caml-list] non-recursive recursive module segfault
2006-08-09 13:51 non-recursive recursive module segfault Jeremy Yallop
@ 2006-08-09 14:30 ` Alain Frisch
2006-08-09 14:56 ` Jeremy Yallop
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Alain Frisch @ 2006-08-09 14:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeremy Yallop; +Cc: caml-list
Jeremy Yallop wrote:
> What behaviour should I expect for the following code? :
>
> module rec M :
> sig
> val m : unit -> unit
> end
> =
> struct
> let h _ _ = ()
> let m = h ()
> end
>
> let _ = M.m ()
>
> According to the documentation this could trigger the exception
> "Undefined_recursive_module", but instead it segfaults.
That's probably the bug 4008:
http://caml.inria.fr/mantis/view.php?id=4008
which is fixed in the 3.09 CVS branch (but not in the 3.10 branch, in
case you tried).
To get rid of the problem, you can either:
- use the CVS version (release309 branch);
- download, compile and link with the following files:
http://camlcvs.inria.fr/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/~checkout~/ocaml/stdlib/camlinternalMod.mli?rev=1.1.8.2
http://camlcvs.inria.fr/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/~checkout~/ocaml/stdlib/camlinternalMod.ml?rev=1.4.2.1
- use ocamlopt
-- Alain
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [Caml-list] non-recursive recursive module segfault
2006-08-09 14:30 ` [Caml-list] " Alain Frisch
@ 2006-08-09 14:56 ` Jeremy Yallop
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jeremy Yallop @ 2006-08-09 14:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alain Frisch; +Cc: caml-list
Alain Frisch wrote:
> Jeremy Yallop wrote:
>> What behaviour should I expect for the following code? :
[...]
>
> That's probably the bug 4008:
>
> http://caml.inria.fr/mantis/view.php?id=4008
>
> which is fixed in the 3.09 CVS branch (but not in the 3.10 branch, in
> case you tried).
>
> To get rid of the problem, you can either:
>
> - use the CVS version (release309 branch);
>
> - download, compile and link with the following files:
>
> http://camlcvs.inria.fr/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/~checkout~/ocaml/stdlib/camlinternalMod.mli?rev=1.1.8.2
> http://camlcvs.inria.fr/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/~checkout~/ocaml/stdlib/camlinternalMod.ml?rev=1.4.2.1
>
> - use ocamlopt
Thanks! All of the above fixed the problem. I'd looked on mantis to
see if was a known problem, but bug 4008 didn't show up when I searched
for "recursive module" (for obvious reasons).
Jeremy.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-08-09 14:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-08-09 13:51 non-recursive recursive module segfault Jeremy Yallop
2006-08-09 14:30 ` [Caml-list] " Alain Frisch
2006-08-09 14:56 ` Jeremy Yallop
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox