From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE0D2BBA7 for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2006 10:36:15 +0100 (CET) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id k179aFqi006698 for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2006 10:36:15 +0100 Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA13022 for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2006 10:36:14 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail.barettadeit.com (h213-255-109-130.albacom.net [213.255.109.130] (may be forged)) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id k179aDiS022117 for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2006 10:36:14 +0100 Received: from [10.1.0.20] (unknown [10.1.0.20]) by mail.barettadeit.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95A4F12563; Tue, 7 Feb 2006 10:37:32 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43E867CE.9080007@barettadeit.com> Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2006 10:26:38 +0100 From: Alessandro Baretta User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051017) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: skaller Cc: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] look for solution OCaml task References: <2777891.post@talk.nabble.com> <43E715FC.1040106@barettadeit.com> <1139222203.8559.2.camel@rosella> In-Reply-To: <1139222203.8559.2.camel@rosella> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 43E86A0F.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 43E86A0D.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; baretta:01 baretta:01 barettadeit:01 caml-list:01 ocaml:01 ocaml:01 ingegneria:98 wrote:01 wrote:01 alessandro:03 alessandro:03 alex:03 languages:03 370:96 370:96 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=disabled version=3.0.3 skaller wrote: > On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 10:25 +0100, Alessandro Baretta wrote: > But if I ran a software engineering class I'd FAIL anyone > that didn't .. not that I could actually understand the question .. :) Actually, neither did I. See the value of formal specification languages? Why not specify this task by writing an Ocaml class providing a reference implementation? Alex -- ********************************************************************* Ing. Alessandro Baretta Studio Baretta http://studio.baretta.com/ Consulenza Tecnologica e Ingegneria Industriale Technological Consulting and Industrial Engineering tel. +39 02 370 111 55 fax. +39 02 370 111 54