From: Ezra Cooper <e.e.k.cooper@sms.ed.ac.uk>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Inspecting a compiled library/interface
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 13:32:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43E209EC.8010206@sms.ed.ac.uk> (raw)
Hi folks,
I have an ocaml program which builds OK as byte-code, but building it as
native code gives me an error that two of my libs disagree over a
standard ocaml library:
Files /home/s0567141/lib/ocamlnet/netstring.cmxa
and /usr/lib/ocaml/stdlib.cmxa
make inconsistent assumptions over implementation Filename
The usual protocol of rebuilding the libraries from scratch didn't help.
I thought it might be that ocamlnet had been built I don't seem to have
some other thing called Filename hanging about. How can I diagnose this?
Is there a tool that lets me inspect these .cmxa files to see what
assumptions they do make? Any ideas how I might have built the netstring
library with strange assumptions on Filename?
Thanks in advance,
Ezra
reply other threads:[~2006-02-02 13:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43E209EC.8010206@sms.ed.ac.uk \
--to=e.e.k.cooper@sms.ed.ac.uk \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox