From: Andreas Rossberg <rossberg@mpi-sws.org>
To: Kenichi Asai <asai@is.ocha.ac.jp>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] string_of_float (0.1 +. 0.2)
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2022 08:22:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43238522-BFA7-4F89-8F91-9D95893A9D74@mpi-sws.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yqk9CiraXjKDfF51@pllab.is.ocha.ac.jp>
You can use sprintf, which allows you to specify a precision:
# Printf.sprintf "%g" (0.1 +. 0.2);;
- : string = "0.3"
# Printf.sprintf "%.16g" (0.1 +. 0.2);;
- : string = "0.3"
# Printf.sprintf "%.18g" (0.1 +. 0.2);;
- : string = "0.300000000000000044"
# Printf.sprintf "%.24g" (0.1 +. 0.2);;
- : string = “0.300000000000000044408921”
The OCaml manual does not say what the default is, but it appears to be .6 for printf (like in C), while string_of_float is equivalent to (sprintf "%.12g”) and the REPL uses .18 (which is the maximum meaningful decimal precision for 64 bit floats):
# Printf.sprintf "%g" 0.1234567890123456789;;
- : string = "0.123457"
# string_of_float 0.123456789012345678;;
- : string = “0.123456789012”
# 0.1234567890123456789;;
- : float = 0.123456789012345677
/Andreas
> On 15. 6. 2022, at 03:59, Kenichi Asai <asai@is.ocha.ac.jp> wrote:
>
> On OCaml 4.12.0 on M1 mac, I got:
>
> # 0.1 +. 0.2;;
> - : float = 0.300000000000000044
> # string_of_float (0.1 +. 0.2);;
> - : string = "0.3"
>
> Why don't I obtain "0.300000000000000044" here?
>
> Here is some background. I am writing an OCaml interpreter that
> mimics most part of the original OCaml interpreter. In the OCaml
> interpreter, 0.1 and 0.2 are represented as
>
> Pexp_constant (Pconst_float ("0.1", None))
> Pexp_constant (Pconst_float ("0.2", None))
>
> When I add these two numbers, I would have to execute
>
> let a = float_of_string "0.1"
> let b = float_of_string "0.2"
> let c = a +. b
> let d = string_of_float c
>
> and then return
>
> Pexp_constant (Pconst_float (d, None))
>
> At this point, however, since d is "0.3" instead of
> "0.300000000000000044" (even though c is 0.300000000000000044), I
> cannot return 0.300000000000000044 as a result. How can I mimic the
> OCaml behavior?
>
> Sincerely,
>
> --
> Kenichi Asai
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-15 6:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-15 1:59 Kenichi Asai
2022-06-15 6:22 ` Andreas Rossberg [this message]
2022-06-15 7:00 ` François Pottier
2022-06-15 14:07 ` Gabriel Scherer
2022-06-15 14:25 ` Daniel Bünzli
2022-06-16 1:45 ` Kenichi Asai
2022-06-16 6:24 ` Oleg
2022-06-16 9:01 ` Andreas Rossberg
2022-06-16 9:14 ` [Caml-list] unsubscribe Jean-Denis EIDEN JEAN-DENIS
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43238522-BFA7-4F89-8F91-9D95893A9D74@mpi-sws.org \
--to=rossberg@mpi-sws.org \
--cc=asai@is.ocha.ac.jp \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox