From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C8F5BDE9 for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2005 06:58:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j814wc1S002794 for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2005 06:58:38 +0200 Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id GAA16876 for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2005 06:58:37 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mz1.forethought.net (mzpi3.forethought.net [216.241.36.12]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j814wasn008196 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2005 06:58:37 +0200 Received: from [216.241.35.41] (helo=[10.0.0.2]) by mz1.forethought.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1EAh9m-0006X0-1j for caml-list@inria.fr; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 22:58:34 -0600 Message-ID: <43168A85.1000900@havenrock.com> Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 22:58:45 -0600 From: Matt Gushee User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050108) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: GUI for OCaml (was: Re: [Caml-list] Does LablTk have a future?) References: <20050830172518.G58228-100000@xs2.xs4all.nl> <8DBC660D-CDBE-4A0E-91AF-81D0E42FC032@wanadoo.fr> In-Reply-To: <8DBC660D-CDBE-4A0E-91AF-81D0E42FC032@wanadoo.fr> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.86.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 43168A7E.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 43168A7C.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 caml-list:01 labltk:01 gtk:01 wxwindows:01 api:01 ...:98 ...:98 wrote:01 widgets:01 widgets:01 gui:04 differences:05 differences:05 style:93 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.0.3 yoann padioleau wrote: > Is there really big a differences between Qt, Gtk, Wxwindows, ... ? > The only difference is maybe the number of widgets it supports, but all those API share the same kind of style, > the same basic widgets. No, there are also important differences in their event handling mechanisms ... can't really go into detail at this moment, but it's something that needs to be considered. -- Matt Gushee Englewood, CO, USA