From: Matt Gushee <mgushee@havenrock.com>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Does LablTk have a future?
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 22:31:27 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4316841F.4090106@havenrock.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050830174757.99765.qmail@web30510.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
David Thomas wrote:
>>Yes but we gain the ability to have a better
>>interface on all platforms.
>
> While pleasantly egotistical, I would have to say that
> this is a false statement. Yes, there are problems
> with any given windowing system. Note, however, that
> the user has already chosen the system whose
> shortcomings they feel the most comfortable with.
True in a way. But really, the vast majority of end users have not
chosen. Their employer, school, or computer vendor has chosen Windows
for them, and they become used to Windows and never give anything else a
fair trial.
But the end result is the same, I suppose.
--
Matt Gushee
Englewood, CO, USA
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-01 4:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-28 15:38 Matt Gushee
[not found] ` <aefe758210f7fa0b9846b0ea4278cf3a@rouaix.org>
2005-08-28 23:21 ` [Caml-list] " Matt Gushee
2005-08-29 22:33 ` Jon Harrop
2005-08-30 4:39 ` Matt Gushee
2005-08-30 11:39 ` Yaron Minsky
2005-08-30 11:48 ` Jon Harrop
2005-08-30 12:22 ` David MENTRE
2005-08-30 13:45 ` Jon Harrop
2005-08-30 15:47 ` David MENTRE
2005-08-30 16:08 ` Jon Harrop
2005-09-01 4:25 ` Matt Gushee
2005-09-01 11:20 ` Matt Gushee
2005-09-01 11:26 ` Matt Gushee
2005-09-01 14:09 ` Chris Campbell
2005-08-30 16:21 ` Bardur Arantsson
2005-08-30 17:47 ` [Caml-list] " David Thomas
2005-08-30 18:06 ` Tyler Eaves
2005-08-30 19:01 ` Jon Harrop
2005-08-30 22:55 ` Chris Campbell
[not found] ` <c22844d10508301553b54841b@mail.gmail.com>
2005-08-30 22:56 ` Fwd: " Chris Campbell
2005-08-30 23:04 ` Doug Kirk
2005-08-31 0:08 ` Fwd: " Jon Harrop
2005-08-31 0:31 ` Olivier Andrieu
2005-08-31 8:48 ` Feeding the OCaml GUI troll (was: Re: [Caml-list] Does LablTk have a future?) David MENTRE
2005-08-31 9:06 ` Proposal a GUI from Ocamlsdl Christophe Raffalli
2005-08-31 14:39 ` [Caml-list] " Jon Harrop
2005-09-01 19:27 ` Nathaniel Gray
2005-08-31 14:27 ` Feeding the OCaml GUI troll (was: Re: [Caml-list] Does LablTk have a future?) Jon Harrop
2005-09-01 4:49 ` Feeding the OCaml GUI troll Matt Gushee
2005-09-01 13:15 ` [Caml-list] " skaller
2005-09-01 13:28 ` David MENTRE
2005-09-01 13:50 ` skaller
2005-09-01 14:43 ` Chris Campbell
2005-09-02 7:40 ` Ville-Pertti Keinonen
2005-09-02 12:39 ` skaller
2005-09-03 10:34 ` Damien Bobillot
2005-09-03 12:30 ` skaller
2005-09-04 14:08 ` Richard Jones
2005-09-03 11:10 ` yoann padioleau
2005-09-03 11:30 ` Jonathan Roewen
2005-09-03 17:23 ` Doug Kirk
2005-09-04 14:01 ` Richard Jones
2005-09-01 19:23 ` Feeding the OCaml GUI troll (was: Re: [Caml-list] Does LablTk have a future?) Nathaniel Gray
2005-09-01 4:31 ` Matt Gushee [this message]
2005-09-01 4:17 ` [Caml-list] Does LablTk have a future? Matt Gushee
2005-09-01 13:25 ` Jon Harrop
2005-08-30 7:16 ` GUI for OCaml (was: Re: [Caml-list] Does LablTk have a future?) David MENTRE
2005-08-30 9:53 ` GUI for OCaml Christophe Raffalli
2005-08-30 10:28 ` [Caml-list] " David MENTRE
2005-08-30 13:04 ` Bünzli Daniel
2005-08-30 17:13 ` David Thomas
2005-08-30 11:18 ` Mark Shinwell
2005-08-30 14:22 ` Jacques Carette
2005-08-30 23:12 ` Pietro Abate
2005-08-30 14:14 ` GUI for OCaml (was: Re: [Caml-list] Does LablTk have a future?) Richard Jones
2005-08-30 15:33 ` mmzeeman
2005-08-30 15:44 ` Jon Harrop
2005-08-30 22:34 ` yoann padioleau
2005-09-01 4:58 ` Matt Gushee
2005-08-30 16:01 ` Jon Harrop
2005-08-30 16:25 ` Chris Campbell
2005-08-30 22:49 ` yoann padioleau
2005-08-30 16:03 ` Chris Campbell
2005-08-30 22:31 ` yoann padioleau
2005-08-31 8:19 ` About Lablgtk2 (was: e: GUI for OCaml) David MENTRE
2005-09-03 11:41 ` yoann padioleau
2005-08-30 17:35 ` [Caml-list] Does LablTk have a future? Olivier Andrieu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4316841F.4090106@havenrock.com \
--to=mgushee@havenrock.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox