From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id B166BBDD1 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 20:58:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j7PIwCUG016716 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 20:58:12 +0200 Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id UAA25817 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 20:58:11 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from postfix4-2.free.fr (postfix4-2.free.fr [213.228.0.176]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j7PIwBJ7024236 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 20:58:11 +0200 Received: from [192.168.0.1] (rke75-3-82-229-183-156.fbx.proxad.net [82.229.183.156]) by postfix4-2.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 383F4323466; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 20:58:11 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <430E13B0.3060906@inria.fr> Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 20:53:36 +0200 From: Alain Frisch User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050331) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: skaller Cc: caml users Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OCamlDuce 3.08.4 References: <430CA5F3.50104@inria.fr> <1124996020.16161.123.camel@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <1124996020.16161.123.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 430E14C4.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 430E14C3.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; frisch:01 frisch:01 caml-list:01 ocamlduce:01 ocamlduce:01 ocaml:01 ocaml:01 wrote:01 alain:03 alain:03 perhaps:03 inria:05 impression:16 there:17 that:22 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.0.3 skaller wrote: > Just to confirm please, my understanding is that there is a good > chance OcamlDuce will just become Ocaml (perhaps Ocaml 4.0?) Not at all. Where did you get this impression? -- Alain