From: Jacques Carette <carette@mcmaster.ca>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Syntax vs Operators
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 11:55:37 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4309F579.4020302@mcmaster.ca> (raw)
I have been going through the documentation, trying to figure out which
constructs in Ocaml are syntactic (like :: seems to be) and cannot be
oer-ridden, and others like + which are values in Pervasives. Is there
a simple way to find out which language constructs are purely syntactic?
The goal is to understand which constructs can be re-defined (locally)
in a module. The eventual application is a more genial syntax for a DSL
implemented via MetaOCaml (and more functors than anyone in their right
mind would really want to use...).
Jacques
next reply other threads:[~2005-08-22 15:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-22 15:55 Jacques Carette [this message]
2005-08-23 10:16 ` [Caml-list] " Damien Doligez
2005-08-23 18:05 ` Jacques Carette
2005-08-23 19:42 ` Damien Doligez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4309F579.4020302@mcmaster.ca \
--to=carette@mcmaster.ca \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox