From: Alain Frisch <Alain.Frisch@inria.fr>
To: "\"Márk S. Zoltán\"" <zoltan.s.mark@dravanet.hu>
Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Parameter evaluation order
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2005 11:12:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4306F415.60806@inria.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43065B83.6050503@dravanet.hu>
Márk S. Zoltán wrote:
> But I do think that currying + strictness + side-effects =>
> left-to-right evaluation order. That is because a multi-parameter
> function application should be functionally equivalent to a closure
> taking the first (== leftmost) parameter and returning a closure which
> takes the second parameter
It is, but your conclusion about left-to-right evaluation order is
wrong. It's just that the binary application operator evaluates first
its second argument (the function's argument), then its first argument
(the functional value), and finally applies the function to the
argument. An application (e1 e2) is semantically equivalent to: (let y
= e2 in let x = e1 in x y). Hence you get right-to-left evaluation order
(but this is not specified).
-- Alain
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-20 9:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-19 22:21 "Márk S. Zoltán"
2005-08-20 9:12 ` Alain Frisch [this message]
2005-08-26 17:53 ` [Caml-list] " "Márk S. Zoltán"
2005-08-22 16:50 ` Damien Doligez
2005-08-23 7:12 ` skaller
2005-08-23 11:29 ` Damien Doligez
2005-08-23 13:34 ` Igor Pechtchanski
2005-08-23 19:52 ` Damien Doligez
2005-08-24 1:24 ` Hao-yang Wang
2005-08-24 11:33 ` [Caml-list] " Damien Doligez
2005-08-24 14:39 ` Christophe Raffalli
2005-08-24 15:47 ` Berkeley DB Joel Reymont
2005-08-24 16:08 ` [Caml-list] Re: Parameter evaluation order brogoff
2005-08-24 20:05 ` Christophe Raffalli
2005-08-24 20:25 ` brogoff
2005-08-24 20:53 ` Jon Harrop
[not found] ` <430CE193.9000805@univ-savoie.fr>
2005-08-26 9:53 ` Christophe Raffalli
2005-08-26 10:10 ` Jon Harrop
2005-08-26 12:09 ` Christophe Raffalli
2005-08-26 12:26 ` Diego Olivier Fernandez Pons
2005-08-26 16:48 ` Christophe Raffalli
2005-08-27 15:33 ` Christophe TROESTLER
2005-08-26 12:36 ` Ville-Pertti Keinonen
2005-08-26 14:17 ` Fernando Alegre
2005-08-26 17:00 ` Christophe Raffalli
2005-08-26 22:58 ` skaller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4306F415.60806@inria.fr \
--to=alain.frisch@inria.fr \
--cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
--cc=zoltan.s.mark@dravanet.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox