* [Fwd: Re: [Caml-list] OCaml for Industry]
@ 2005-08-08 20:14 Ken Rose
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Ken Rose @ 2005-08-08 20:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ocaml Mailing List
Oops. I meant to send this to the list...
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OCaml for Industry
Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 13:11:14 -0700
From: Ken Rose <kenrose@tfb.com>
Reply-To: rose@acm.org
To: Jon Harrop <jon@ffconsultancy.com>
References: <200508011826.52882.jon@ffconsultancy.com>
<200508081820.09595.jon@ffconsultancy.com>
<1123523898.6848.107.camel@localhost.localdomain>
<200508081935.01424.jon@ffconsultancy.com>
Jon Harrop wrote:
> On Monday 08 August 2005 18:58, skaller wrote:
>>That is a silly conclusion IMHO. Did you really expect existing
>>Ocaml experts to buy a report on use of Ocaml in industry targetted
>>at MANAGERS??
>
> My theory was that programmers who appreciate better languages might want some
> evidence that they can present to their managers in order to help justify the
> use of non-mainstream languages. I was curious to see if anyone here was in
> such a position.
I'm a programmer who fits that description. Unfortunately, I don't have
authority to buy a box of paperclips, let alone spend 800GBP on a report.
> I get the impression that most people here (like me) write OCaml code without
> benefit of a manager. ;-)
<raises hand>
- ken
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2005-08-08 20:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-08-08 20:14 [Fwd: Re: [Caml-list] OCaml for Industry] Ken Rose
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox