Mailing list for all users of the OCaml language and system.
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anil Madhavapeddy <anil@recoil.org>
To: "Török Edwin" <edwin+ml-ocaml@etorok.net>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OPAM: retiring 3.12.1 testing?
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 11:25:23 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <42E64AD5-D700-4985-AFE8-AB14BA2CFCFA@recoil.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54E1D2AA.7040509@etorok.net>

On 16 Feb 2015, at 11:21, Török Edwin <edwin+ml-ocaml@etorok.net> wrote:
> 
> On 02/16/2015 01:04 PM, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
>> Dear OCaml list,
>> 
>> We are currently testing the following compiler versions on every pull request to OPAM;
>> 
>> - OCaml 3.12.1
>> - OCaml 4.00.1
>> - OCaml 4.01.0
>> - OCaml 4.02.0
>> 
>> We will shortly have to test 4.02.1, and would also like to test trunk snapshots of the
>> compiler as an "allowed failure".
>> 
>> Running 6 compiler revisions per package puts quite a bit of stress on our Travis CI
>> resources, and so it's probably time to retire OCaml 3.12.1 from the testing matrix.
>> 
>> Before we do this, I'd like to get a sense for how many people still care about ensuring
>> that their packages work well on the 3.12.1 series, or if there are still distributions
>> for which this support matters.  If there is still sufficient interest, we can continue
>> to support 3.12.1 for some time.
> 
> Debian's latest stable (Wheezy) has 3.12.1, and the next release Jessie has 4.01.0 and there is an RC1 installer for it, but AFAIK there is no fixed release date when Jessie becomes stable.
> Would be nice to have 3.12.1 tests until Jessie becomes stable, but OTOH there are quite a few packages already that only build with >=4.x
> and if one wants to build them on 3.12.1 they require some minor patches already.

That's a good point.  We'll just have to keep 3.12.1 in the matrix until Jessie rotates in and has a settling period.

> Does OPAM support conditionally applying patches? (i.e. only apply patch if compiler_ver <= 4.00.0)

It does; just add a constraint on `ocaml-version` to the `patches` field.  For example, see:

https://github.com/ocaml/opam-repository/blob/master/packages/bitstring/bitstring.2.0.4/opam#L14

Patches to backport 3.12.1 support to any 4.00+ package from users are welcome.  They are minimally intrusive to users of newer compilers since the patches aren't applied unless the older compiler is used, so it's easier to merge these into the OPAM-repository.

-anil

  reply	other threads:[~2015-02-16 11:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-16 11:04 Anil Madhavapeddy
2015-02-16 11:21 ` Török Edwin
2015-02-16 11:25   ` Anil Madhavapeddy [this message]
2015-02-16 15:59 ` François Bobot
2015-02-16 16:09   ` Gabriel Scherer
2015-02-16 18:22 ` Stephen Dolan
2015-02-16 18:52 ` Adrien Nader
2015-02-17  0:36   ` [Caml-list] [opam-devel] " Louis Gesbert
2015-02-17  7:15   ` [Caml-list] " Anil Madhavapeddy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=42E64AD5-D700-4985-AFE8-AB14BA2CFCFA@recoil.org \
    --to=anil@recoil.org \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    --cc=edwin+ml-ocaml@etorok.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox