From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DF5DD171 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 19:22:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j6PHM4AQ008856 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 19:22:04 +0200 Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id TAA24516 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 19:22:03 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from smtp01.isp.itmonitor.net (smtp01.isp.itmonitor.net [207.158.33.182]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j6PHM2M5008852 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 19:22:02 +0200 Received: from tfb.com (o1-dialup-66-81-16-42.rev.o1.com [66.81.16.42]) by smtp01.isp.itmonitor.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 780D5A5C541; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:22:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <42E51FB1.3010700@tfb.com> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:21:53 -0700 From: Ken Rose Reply-To: rose@acm.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030703 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] How to do this properly with OCaml? References: <42E2393B.5030209@inria.fr> <1122226423.9027.23.camel@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <1122226423.9027.23.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 42E51FBC.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 42E51FBA.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 ocaml:01 wrote:01 supported:01 implemented:02 variable:06 obvious:06 missing:06 wrong:08 magic:10 ken:11 ken:11 obj:12 something:12 what's:14 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=disabled version=3.0.3 skaller wrote: > > I would appreciate an officially supported variable > length array a lot: it can't be efficiently implemented > *without* Obj.magic. I must be missing something obvious. What's wrong with map? - ken