From: Jason Hickey <jyh@cs.caltech.edu>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: Pervasives.compare output type
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 14:07:24 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42433A1C.2060203@cs.caltech.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d1vc0m$eps$1@sea.gmane.org>
Bardur Arantsson wrote:
> Actually, since integers in OCaml are limited to (n-1) bits where n=32
> or n=64 depending on architecture, overflow shouldn't be a problem. (The
> comments in byterun/compare.c also seem to agree with that.)
>
> Even so, it would be very slow to the polymorphic compare to compare
> integers, so if one cares about efficiency, direct subtraction is
> preferable.
>
This discussion just came up on the MetaPRL list. Here is an excerpt.
---
By the way, I tried using subtraction for a comparison, and it failed
miserably:(
...
It is easy to explain--transitivity breaks. For example, using
subtraction, the following two relations hold: (min_int < 0) and (0 <
1); however (min_int > 1). Oops...
Aleksey Nogin wrote some micro-benchmarks. These are
back-of-the-envelope, so don't take them as definitive.
> I wrote the following test:
>
> ------------
>
> open Printf
> open Unix
>
> let f1 x y = Pervasives.compare x y
> let f2 (x: int) y = Pervasives.compare x y
> let f3 x y = if x=y then Pervasives.compare "s1" "s2" else if x < y then -1 else 1
> let f4 (x: int) y = if x=y then Pervasives.compare "s1" "s2" else if x < y then -1 else 1
> let f5 x y = let i = Pervasives.compare x y in if i = 0 then Pervasives.compare "s1" "s2" else i
> let f6 (x: int) y = let i = Pervasives.compare x y in if i = 0 then Pervasives.compare "s1" "s2" else i
> let f7 x y = match Pervasives.compare x y with 0 -> Pervasives.compare "s1" "s2" | i -> i
> let f8 (x: int) y = match Pervasives.compare x y with 0 -> Pervasives.compare "s1" "s2" | i -> i
>
> let time name f =
> let t1=Unix.times () in
> for i = 10 to 30000000 do ignore(f i 20) done;
> let t2=Unix.times () in
> eprintf "Function %s: user time: %f; system time: %f\n%!" name (t2.tms_utime -. t1.tms_utime) (t2.tms_stime -. t1.tms_s
> time)
>
> let time_all () =
> time "f1" f1;
> time "f2" f2;
> time "f3" f3;
> time "f4" f4;
> time "f5" f5;
> time "f6" f6;
> time "f7" f7;
> time "f8" f8
>
> let () =
> time_all ();
> time_all ();
> time_all ()
>
> -----------------
>
> and here are rhe approximate running times:
>
> Function f1: user time: 1.060000; system time: 0.000000
> Function f2: user time: 0.520000; system time: 0.000000
> Function f3: user time: 2.970000; system time: 0.000000
> Function f4: user time: 0.340000; system time: 0.000000
> Function f5: user time: 1.110000; system time: 0.000000
> Function f6: user time: 0.570000; system time: 0.000000
> Function f7: user time: 1.110000; system time: 0.000000
> Function f8: user time: 0.550000; system time: 0.000000
>
> --
> Aleksey Nogin
Jason
--
Jason Hickey http://www.cs.caltech.edu/~jyh
Caltech Computer Science Tel: 626-395-6568 FAX: 626-792-4257
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-24 22:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-24 18:47 Alex Baretta
2005-03-24 19:41 ` [Caml-list] " Richard Jones
2005-03-24 21:00 ` Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
2005-03-24 21:38 ` Bardur Arantsson
2005-03-24 22:07 ` Jason Hickey [this message]
2005-03-24 22:26 ` [Caml-list] " brogoff
2005-03-25 9:42 ` Alex Baretta
2005-04-01 5:59 ` Aleksey Nogin
2005-03-24 22:15 ` Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
2005-03-24 22:41 ` Bardur Arantsson
2005-03-25 9:43 ` [Caml-list] " Alex Baretta
2005-03-29 7:14 ` [Caml-list] " Oliver Bandel
2005-03-30 14:17 ` Xavier Leroy
2005-03-30 14:45 ` Alex Baretta
2005-03-30 15:11 ` Jacques Carette
2005-03-30 15:28 ` Alex Baretta
2005-03-30 17:47 ` brogoff
2005-03-30 18:21 ` Jacques Carette
2005-03-30 18:49 ` brogoff
2005-03-30 20:06 ` Jon Harrop
2005-03-30 20:43 ` Jacques Carette
2005-03-30 22:14 ` Christopher Dutchyn
2005-03-31 0:44 ` brogoff
2005-03-30 22:43 ` GADT?? (Re: [Caml-list] Pervasives.compare output type) Oliver Bandel
2005-03-30 22:35 ` [Caml-list] Pervasives.compare output type Oliver Bandel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42433A1C.2060203@cs.caltech.edu \
--to=jyh@cs.caltech.edu \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox