From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 590F6BB81 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2004 21:01:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id iBHK1HQB005821 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2004 21:01:17 +0100 Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id VAA11979 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2004 21:01:17 +0100 (MET) Received: from alex.barettalocal.com (h213-255-109-130.albacom.net [213.255.109.130] (may be forged)) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id iBHK1G7v005815 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2004 21:01:17 +0100 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alex.barettalocal.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58C4A2BAA94; Fri, 17 Dec 2004 21:01:18 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <41C33B0D.2090504@barettadeit.com> Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 21:01:17 +0100 From: Alex Baretta User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20041007 Debian/1.7.3-5 X-Accept-Language: it, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Ennals, Robert" Cc: Ocaml Subject: Re: [Caml-list] [OT] Rant about VCS References: <6E36ED6CF6A06B49928F02ECE2291CADE05435@swsmsx403.ger.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <6E36ED6CF6A06B49928F02ECE2291CADE05435@swsmsx403.ger.corp.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 41C33B0D.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 41C33B0C.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; baretta:01 caml-list:01 wrote:01 makefile:01 ocaml:01 makefiles:01 findlib:01 baretta:01 faq:01 alex:03 alex:03 executable:03 executable:03 370:96 370:96 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.0 (2004-09-13) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=disabled version=3.0.0 X-Spam-Level: Ennals, Robert wrote: > What is wrong with the solution to the executable bit problem suggested > in the Darcs FAQ? > > Include a line in the makefile that sets the executable bit for any > scripts that should be executable. If you wanted to be more "make-like" > you could even copy the script, and then set the executable bit in the > copy. My problem is that the project is so extensive that we use an ocaml program to generate the Makefiles and a bash script to appropriately configure findlib before anything gets done. I think we'll manage with darcs, but really I begin to understand why Linus went proprietary with Bitkeeper. Alex -- ********************************************************************* http://www.barettadeit.com/ Baretta DE&IT A division of Baretta SRL tel. +39 02 370 111 55 fax. +39 02 370 111 54 Our technology: The Application System/Xcaml (AS/Xcaml) The FreerP Project