From: Aaron Bohannon <bohannon@seas.upenn.edu>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: native code and ZINC machine
Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2004 09:25:26 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <418B8D56.5010109@seas.upenn.edu> (raw)
I was quite surprised, recently, when I found out that the native code
compiler implements left-to-right evaulation, as opposed to the
right-to-left evaulation of the bytecode. [NB: My question is not about
trying to write code that is dependent on the order of arguments.]
You see, I am quite familiar with the ZINC machine and the benefits of
its design, and I thought that the design could be adapted in some way
or another to the native code setting. I am interested in finding out
what factors prevented this, or what made the ZINC machine execution
model impractical in the native runtime. My knowledge of systems is
perhaps somewhat weak, so maybe I am overlooking some obvious point.
I have googled for papers and discussions, and poked around the obvious
websites looking for answers, but I must have missed something. Any
pointers in the right direction would be appreciated.
Aaron Bohannon
next reply other threads:[~2004-11-05 14:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-05 14:25 Aaron Bohannon [this message]
2004-11-06 9:37 ` [Caml-list] " Xavier Leroy
2004-11-06 16:53 ` David Brown
2004-11-08 8:52 ` Diego Olivier Fernandez Pons
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=418B8D56.5010109@seas.upenn.edu \
--to=bohannon@seas.upenn.edu \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox