From: Florian Hars <hars@bik-gmbh.de>
To: briand@aracnet.com
Cc: caml-bugs@inria.fr, caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr
Subject: Baffeld by manual (Was: [Caml-list] baffled by semicolon)
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 09:12:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4132D36D.4020104@bik-gmbh.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16685.22393.76718.150882@soggy.deldotd.com>
briand@aracnet.com wrote:
> I went back through the manual and really couldn't find anything which
> explained the difference between ; and ;;
Yeah, this is a bug in section 1.5 "Imperative Features" of the manual. (IMHO,
the whole Part I is not what it claims to be and the Ocaml team should stop
calling it an introduction into the language, but I've said that before
http://caml.inria.fr/archives/200210/msg00451.html)
Now, if you want to be anal, you might say that all that needs to be said is
indeed said in the manual, in section 6.7.2 "Control Structures"
| The expression expr1 ; expr2 evaluates expr1 first, then expr2, and returns
| the value of expr2.
together with section 6.11.2 "Structures":
| For compatibility with toplevel phrases (chapter 9) and with Caml Light, an
| optional ;; is allowed after each definition in a structure. The ;; has no
| semantic meaning. Also for compatibility, ;; expr is allowed as a component
| of a structure, meaning let _ = expr, i.e. evaluate expr for its
| side-effects.
But to find this section (and to see why it is indeed the answer to your
question) requires some ingenuity, since you are not dealing with a structure
proper, but with a compilation unit, and section 6.12 doesn't mention this
peculiarity. You have to guess its relevance from the "behaves roughly as".
With this knoledge, you can see let your version with a single semicolon
> let w = area#misc#realize ();
> area#misc#window;;
is equivalent to the definition:
let w = let _ = area#misc#realize () in area#misc#window
while the version with the double semicolon is
let w = area.misc.realize ()
let _ = area#misc#window
which binds w to unit and ignores the value of area#misc#window.
Yours, Florian
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-30 7:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-26 3:22 [Caml-list] baffled by semicolon briand
2004-08-26 3:30 ` David Brown
2004-08-26 4:18 ` Alex Valdez
2004-08-26 5:05 ` briand
2004-08-29 4:45 ` William Lovas
2004-08-30 7:12 ` Florian Hars [this message]
2004-08-30 8:06 ` Baffeld by manual (Was: [Caml-list] baffled by semicolon) skaller
2004-08-30 8:23 ` Radu Grigore
2004-08-30 8:25 ` Ville-Pertti Keinonen
2004-08-30 11:07 ` skaller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4132D36D.4020104@bik-gmbh.de \
--to=hars@bik-gmbh.de \
--cc=briand@aracnet.com \
--cc=caml-bugs@inria.fr \
--cc=caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox