From: Francois BERENGER <berenger@bioreg.kyushu-u.ac.jp>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: [Caml-list] Can this code be accelerated by porting it to SPOC, SAREK or MetaOCaml ?
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 15:28:57 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <412f58b7-8a8b-2356-2626-e1bd010be683@bioreg.kyushu-u.ac.jp> (raw)
Dear OCaml hackers,
I am wondering if some high performance OCaml experts out there
can know in advance if some code can go faster by executing it
on a GPU.
I'd like to get some feeling before I invest into some new technology.
I'd like to stay in OCaml, not drop down to C.
So I mention SPOC, SAREK and MetaOCaml which look like the right
technologies.
I have some clear bottleneck in my program.
Here is how the code looks like:
---
let f (points: (Vector3.t * float) list) =
let acc = ref [] in
let ac p1 x (p2, y) =
acc := (Vector3.dist p1 p2, x *. y) :: !acc
in
let rec loop = function
| [] -> ()
| (p1, x) :: xs ->
L.iter (ac p1 x) xs;
loop xs
in
loop points;
!acc
---
So, in terms of size: each point is 3 floats (a 3D coordinate) plus 1
float (some value).
I usually have several thousands of points, but less than 10_000.
The f function will be called thousands of times for one run of the
program (let's say 300k calls is a big but reasonable use case).
I don't care about the order of points in the input list.
I also don't care about the order of the results in acc.
I very probably don't care about using single point precision (32 bit
floats) for everything, instead of double precision.
Thanks a lot for any feedback.
Best regards,
Francois.
PS: vector3 is available in opam, if that helps
next reply other threads:[~2017-06-15 6:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-15 6:28 Francois BERENGER [this message]
2017-06-15 7:09 ` Ronan Le Hy
2017-06-15 10:38 ` Ivan Gotovchits
2017-06-16 9:49 ` Francois BERENGER
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=412f58b7-8a8b-2356-2626-e1bd010be683@bioreg.kyushu-u.ac.jp \
--to=berenger@bioreg.kyushu-u.ac.jp \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox