From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id UAA28467; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 20:50:28 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id UAA28456; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 20:50:27 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from rabelais.socialtools.net (rabelais.socialtools.net [81.2.94.243]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i5SIoQSH026921; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 20:50:26 +0200 Received: by rabelais.socialtools.net (Postfix, from userid 108) id 0500B2332F; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:50:25 +0100 (BST) Received: from [81.2.94.242] (chaucer.socialtools.net [81.2.94.242]) by rabelais.socialtools.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CCB4232FD; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:50:25 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <40E0685F.4050709@socialtools.net> Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:50:07 +0100 From: Benjamin Geer User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7 (X11/20040615) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Xavier Leroy Cc: Christophe Raffalli , caml-list Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Thread and kernel 2.6 pb still there in CVS References: <20040624194603.2A91010EF06@clark.cs.brown.edu> <1088158825.1941.113.camel@pelican.wigram> <20040625110748.GB2707@bourg.inria.fr> <1088166608.1941.120.camel@pelican.wigram> <40DC38D3.4010009@univ-savoie.fr> <20040628150805.GC7353@yquem.inria.fr> In-Reply-To: <20040628150805.GC7353@yquem.inria.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on rabelais.socialtools.net X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 40E06872.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 sched:01 omitted:01 ingo:99 sem:99 sem:99 kernel:01 kernel:01 thread:02 wrote:03 timeout:05 cvs:05 benjamin:07 i'm:07 www:91 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Xavier Leroy wrote: > The question I'm currently investigating is whether the call to > sched_yield() can be omitted Ingo Molnar has suggested calling nanosleep() or sem_timedwait(sem, abs_timeout) instead: http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0312.2/1127.html Ben ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners