From: Benjamin Geer <ben@socialtools.net>
To: "N. Owen Gunden" <ogunden@phauna.org>
Cc: Christophe TROESTLER <Christophe.Troestler@umh.ac.be>,
"O'Caml Mailing List" <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OCaml development site
Date: Fri, 07 May 2004 19:42:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <409BD8B2.2020307@socialtools.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040507180905.GA4891@phauna.org>
N. Owen Gunden wrote:
> a lot of
> overlapping work would have to go into this CPAN-like repository.
To me their proposal seems complementary to GODI. GODI provides the
convenience of being able to get a lot of libraries in one place.
Richard and Christophe's proposed site could be a place where you could
find a lot of stuff *about* those libraries (mailing lists,
documentation, development versions) in one place, and with a consistent
user interface; I think it would be a great service to the community.
Maybe it could be designed so that it doesn't overlap with GODI, but
rather cooperates with it.
> I warn you that it
> seems on this list that O'Caml programmers are very particular about
> what revision control system (and probably web tools, etc.) they use, so
> may be hard to please a critical mass :).
Some do feel strongly about such things, but I don't. Having a site
where everything worked in a consistent manner for every project would
be a big benefit for users; that would outweigh any small inconvenience
for me as a developer.
A Perl developer remarked to me recently that one of the main benefits
of CPAN is that it encourages Perl developers to look at, and reuse,
each other's code.
Ben
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-07 18:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-05-07 10:44 Christophe TROESTLER
2004-05-07 11:31 ` John Goerzen
2004-05-07 11:56 ` Richard Jones
2004-05-07 13:56 ` Olivier Grisel
2004-05-07 14:04 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2004-05-07 14:33 ` Christophe TROESTLER
2004-05-07 19:13 ` Evan Martin
2004-05-07 11:48 ` Nicolas Cannasse
2004-05-07 14:53 ` John Goerzen
2004-05-07 15:07 ` Nicolas Cannasse
2004-05-07 15:40 ` Richard Jones
2004-05-07 15:41 ` Richard Jones
2004-05-07 15:46 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2004-05-07 16:04 ` Paul Snively
2004-05-07 17:55 ` sylvain.le-gall
2004-05-07 18:09 ` N. Owen Gunden
2004-05-07 18:42 ` Benjamin Geer [this message]
2004-05-07 19:48 ` Christophe TROESTLER
2004-05-07 20:43 ` Kenneth Knowles
2004-05-08 10:06 ` Stefano Zacchiroli
2004-05-10 7:32 ` Jean-Christophe Filliatre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=409BD8B2.2020307@socialtools.net \
--to=ben@socialtools.net \
--cc=Christophe.Troestler@umh.ac.be \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=ogunden@phauna.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox