From: Benjamin Geer <ben@socialtools.net>
To: skaller@users.sourceforge.net
Cc: caml-list <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: OT: licences (was Re: [Caml-list] Dynamically evaluating OCaml code)
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2004 09:35:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40766052.1020402@socialtools.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1081496258.20677.143.camel@pelican>
skaller wrote:
> Ocaml itself isn't a problem: the intent is clear,
> the distro is to be trusted (I won't modify it even
> if I do find a bug), and there is always an option
> of a commercial licence.
There's no harm in asking third-party library authors if they'll sell
you a commercial licence, too. This is what has enabled MySQL AB to
release a popular database as free software.
From the library vendor's point of view, the GPL is better than the
LGPL for this purpose, because using the GPL requires more developers of
non-free software to pay for commercial licences, thus providing more
financial support for free software.
Ben
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-09 8:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 147+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-07 18:47 [Caml-list] Dynamically evaluating OCaml code John Goerzen
2004-04-07 20:37 ` Samuel Mimram
2004-04-07 21:05 ` Basile Starynkevitch
2002-01-04 0:43 ` Issac Trotts
2004-04-08 0:58 ` Dustin Sallings
2004-04-08 6:24 ` Brian Hurt
2004-04-08 7:47 ` Oleg Trott
2004-04-08 8:04 ` Ville-Pertti Keinonen
2004-04-08 7:52 ` Ville-Pertti Keinonen
2004-04-08 8:15 ` Dustin Sallings
2004-04-08 13:37 ` John Goerzen
2004-04-08 14:56 ` Markus Mottl
2004-04-08 15:14 ` Richard Jones
2004-04-08 15:26 ` Markus Mottl
2004-04-08 15:39 ` Jon Harrop
2004-04-08 15:58 ` John Goerzen
2004-04-08 17:59 ` Jean-Marc EBER
2004-04-08 18:20 ` Kenneth Knowles
2004-04-08 18:39 ` John Goerzen
2004-04-08 19:21 ` Kenneth Knowles
2004-04-08 18:29 ` John Goerzen
2004-04-13 6:15 ` Trevor Andrade
2004-04-13 11:17 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2004-04-13 13:16 ` skaller
2004-04-13 14:24 ` John Goerzen
2004-04-13 14:53 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2004-04-13 18:07 ` [Caml-list] Re: GODI (was: Dynamically evaluating OCaml code) Christophe TROESTLER
2004-04-13 19:30 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2004-04-13 19:57 ` [Caml-list] Re: GODI Christophe TROESTLER
2004-04-13 20:45 ` Brandon J. Van Every
2004-04-14 0:34 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2004-04-14 5:35 ` Brandon J. Van Every
2004-04-14 6:00 ` james woodyatt
2004-04-14 6:21 ` Kenneth Knowles
2004-04-14 9:17 ` james woodyatt
2004-04-14 6:16 ` Kenneth Knowles
2004-04-14 7:38 ` [Caml-list] BSD vs. GPL Brandon J. Van Every
2004-04-14 8:32 ` Matt Gushee
2004-04-14 8:48 ` Wolfgang Müller
2004-04-14 8:40 ` Kenneth Knowles
2004-04-14 17:14 ` David Brown
2004-04-14 18:50 ` [Caml-list] benefit of package management Brandon J. Van Every
2004-04-15 6:46 ` [Caml-list] BSD vs. GPL Kenneth Knowles
2004-04-14 15:05 ` John Goerzen
2004-04-15 0:20 ` skaller
2004-04-15 2:36 ` John Goerzen
2004-04-15 17:48 ` Benjamin Geer
2004-04-14 10:50 ` [Caml-list] Re: GODI skaller
2004-04-14 1:04 ` John Goerzen
2004-04-14 2:52 ` Jacques GARRIGUE
2004-04-14 5:14 ` [Caml-list] Re: GODI vs. Ocamake Brandon J. Van Every
2004-04-14 6:53 ` Jacques GARRIGUE
2004-04-14 6:57 ` Kenneth Knowles
[not found] ` <407D2075.2070104@jollys.org>
2004-04-14 16:14 ` ocamlconf on Cygwin (Re: [Caml-list] Re: GODI vs. Ocamake) Kenneth Knowles
2004-04-14 7:50 ` [Caml-list] Re: GODI vs. Ocamake Nicolas Cannasse
2004-04-14 11:54 ` skaller
2004-04-14 16:49 ` Kenneth Knowles
2004-04-15 1:05 ` skaller
2004-04-15 6:34 ` Kenneth Knowles
2004-04-15 7:33 ` skaller
2004-04-15 16:00 ` Kenneth Knowles
[not found] ` <1082049025.20677.1250.camel@pelican>
2004-04-15 17:38 ` Kenneth Knowles
2004-04-15 23:58 ` Brandon J. Van Every
2004-04-16 1:16 ` Kenneth Knowles
2004-04-16 6:31 ` [Caml-list] build tools - good vs. fast, both cheap Brandon J. Van Every
2004-04-16 14:38 ` skaller
2004-04-16 15:16 ` Richard Jones
2004-04-16 16:12 ` Kenneth Knowles
2004-04-16 16:17 ` Richard Jones
2004-04-16 16:39 ` Kenneth Knowles
2004-04-17 6:01 ` Jacques GARRIGUE
2004-04-17 6:25 ` Kenneth Knowles
2004-04-17 9:19 ` Alain.Frisch
2004-04-16 21:53 ` William Lovas
2004-04-17 2:30 ` skaller
2004-04-17 5:47 ` Blair Zajac
2004-04-17 6:28 ` Kenneth Knowles
2004-04-16 14:52 ` skaller
2004-04-16 16:06 ` Kenneth Knowles
2004-04-16 18:10 ` skaller
2004-04-16 18:43 ` Kenneth Knowles
2004-04-16 19:55 ` skaller
2004-04-16 18:46 ` John Goerzen
2004-04-16 18:55 ` Kenneth Knowles
2004-04-16 20:22 ` skaller
2004-04-16 19:39 ` Richard Jones
2004-04-16 21:00 ` skaller
2004-04-15 9:47 ` [Caml-list] Re: GODI vs. Ocamake Markus Mottl
2004-04-15 16:38 ` skaller
2004-04-16 1:30 ` Richard Cole
2004-04-16 14:11 ` skaller
2004-04-15 1:25 ` skaller
2004-04-14 12:19 ` skaller
2004-04-14 18:21 ` [Caml-list] recompiling bytecode Brandon J. Van Every
2004-04-14 18:54 ` John Goerzen
2004-04-14 20:26 ` Issac Trotts
2004-04-14 20:35 ` Basile Starynkevitch
2004-04-15 1:39 ` skaller
2004-04-14 13:03 ` [Caml-list] Re: GODI vs. Ocamake Gerd Stolpmann
2004-04-14 12:45 ` [Caml-list] Re: GODI Gerd Stolpmann
2004-04-13 15:03 ` [Caml-list] Dynamically evaluating OCaml code Matt Gushee
2004-04-13 17:24 ` Benjamin Geer
2004-04-09 5:40 ` skaller
2004-04-08 15:30 ` John Goerzen
2004-04-08 16:08 ` Xavier Leroy
2004-04-08 16:44 ` Markus Mottl
2004-04-08 17:35 ` John Goerzen
2004-04-09 6:41 ` skaller
2004-04-08 19:44 ` Issac Trotts
2004-04-09 6:23 ` skaller
2004-04-09 6:33 ` Remi Vanicat
2004-04-09 7:37 ` skaller
2004-04-09 8:17 ` Remi Vanicat
2004-04-09 8:35 ` Benjamin Geer [this message]
2004-04-10 10:10 ` OT: licences (was Re: [Caml-list] Dynamically evaluating OCaml code) skaller
2004-04-09 8:36 ` [Caml-list] Dynamically evaluating OCaml code Markus Mottl
2004-04-10 9:59 ` skaller
2004-04-09 9:09 ` james woodyatt
2004-04-08 16:44 ` Bruno.Verlyck
2004-04-08 17:55 ` John Goerzen
2004-04-09 13:44 ` Bruno.Verlyck
2004-04-08 15:31 ` Jon Harrop
2004-04-08 19:52 ` Issac Trotts
2004-04-25 23:07 ` [Caml-list] Is GCaml Dead Again? Greg K
2004-04-08 15:04 ` [Caml-list] Dynamically evaluating OCaml code Fernando Alegre
2004-04-08 15:22 ` Jean-Marc EBER
2004-04-09 6:44 ` Pierre Weis
2004-04-08 15:23 ` Kenneth Knowles
2004-04-08 15:38 ` John Goerzen
2004-04-08 22:31 ` Markus Mottl
2004-04-08 18:28 ` Nicolas Cannasse
2004-04-08 17:15 ` Brian Hurt
2004-04-08 18:32 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2004-04-09 5:04 ` skaller
2004-04-08 17:25 ` Issac Trotts
2004-04-08 7:10 ` Basile Starynkevitch
2004-04-08 17:09 ` Issac Trotts
2004-04-07 21:32 ` Vitaly Lugovsky
2004-04-07 20:39 ` John Goerzen
2004-04-07 21:47 ` Vitaly Lugovsky
2004-04-07 22:14 ` Benjamin Geer
2004-04-08 7:49 ` skaller
2004-04-08 19:11 ` Christophe TROESTLER
[not found] ` <200404072306.15109.clement.capel@free.fr>
2004-04-07 23:25 ` clement capel
2004-04-13 21:25 ` [Caml-list] eval for OCaml Brock
2004-04-08 0:17 ` [Caml-list] Dynamically evaluating OCaml code Jon Harrop
2004-04-08 17:31 ` Walid Taha
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40766052.1020402@socialtools.net \
--to=ben@socialtools.net \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=skaller@users.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox